Abstract

The aim of the study was to examine how different book series support teacher in the pupil assessment. The focus of the study was on the demand of many-sidedness and continuity of assessment expressed in the curriculum. All materials in three different book series made for 2nd grade were analyzed. All the assessment instructions were collected from the materials and they were quantitatively examined based on their amount and location. The instructions were divided in two groups based on qualitative analysis: hands-on instructions and pedagogical instructions. Based on results Finnish textbook series follow well the concrete aims set out in the curriculum (Opetushallitus, 2004). Instead it is not so straightforward to interpret many-sidedness and continuity because the concepts can be defined in many ways. However, it can be noted that the assessment emphasizes one-sided traditional assessment: teacher gives the assessment, the aim of the assessment is to collect information, the target of the assessment is the learning result, and the method for assessment is quantitative tests. Newer forms of assessment could be found from the researched materials but they didn’t appear very systematically. When researching the continuity of the assessment it was found out that the materials guided teachers to make assessments several times during the semester. The assessment was suggested to perform at the end of the study module. The materials didn’t guide systematically to assess during the study module. FULL TEXT IN FINNISH

Highlights

  • The aim of the study was to examine how different book series support teacher in the pupil assessment

  • The focus of the study was on the demand of many-sidedness and continuity

  • of assessment expressed in the curriculum

Read more

Summary

Johdanto

Uuden opetussuunnitelman (Opetushallitus, 2014) myötä arviointi ja arviointikulttuurin muutos ovat nousseet esille monissa yhteyksissä. Myös tutkimustulokset tukevat arkikäsitystä siitä, että opettajat kokevat arvioinnin haastavaksi (Hovila, 2009; Metsä, 2001) tai ainakin tiedostavat sen sisältävän erilaisia haasteita (Nieminen, 2012). Oppimateriaalit ovat tärkeässä roolissa opettajan arjessa (Perkkilä & Lehtelä, 2007; Pehkonen & Rossi, 2007). Että opetussuunnitelman toteutuminen opetuksessa onkin usein riippuvainen oppikirjantekijöiden tulkinnasta (Kananoja, 1999). Matematiikan oppilasarviointia oppimateriaalien näkökulmasta on Suomessa tutkittu vain vähän. Aikaisemmissa tutkimuksissa matematiikan oppimateriaalien on todettu vastaavan opetussuunnitelmaa (Joutsenlahti & Vainionpää, 2007; Pispa & Rantanen, 2007) ja summatiivisten kokeiden vastaavan oppilaan tunnilla harjoittelemia tehtäviä (Saarinen & Tuominen, 2007) ja siten opetussuunnitelmaa. Tutkimus perustuu pro gradu – tutkielmaan (Leppävuori, 2013)

Arviointi perusopetuksessa
Arvioinnin osa-alueet
Arviointikäsityksen laajentuminen
Tutkimustehtävä ja tutkimuskysymykset
Tutkimusaineisto
Tutkimusaineiston analysointi
Arviointimateriaalin monipuolisuus
Arviointiohjeiden laatu ja jatkuvuus
Pohdinta

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.