Abstract

The present article uses Q-Method to uncover, what we refer to as, learning identities in an undergraduate core political science course. The term “learning identities” is employed to highlight the self-referential quality of the learning perspectives revealed in the Q-Sorting exercise. Drawing on a set of 41 objectivist statements derived from the broad field of learning style inventories, a taxonomy of five distinct learning identities is described and discussed below. These include: Adept Learners, Traditionalists, Obliged Pupils, Apathetic Pupils, and Objective Learners. After describing these ideal-typical learner self-conceptions, the authors discuss how this knowledge can be a valuable tool for college and university political science faculty, informing such efforts as curriculum development and instructional approaches. Although learning style inventories have long been a part of the pedagogical literature, few attempts have been made to unify the varying measures of personality type, information-processing approaches, and environmental preferences into a single self-referential tool, and fewer approaches still have sought to focus such a tool specifically on the task of teaching politics at the undergraduate level. The present article seeks to contribute to the task of filling this void.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call