Abstract

The creation of restriction enzymes with programmable DNA-binding and -cleavage specificities has long been a goal of modern biology. The recently discovered Type IIL MmeI family of restriction-and-modification (RM) enzymes that possess a shared target recognition domain provides a framework for engineering such new specificities. However, a lack of structural information on Type IIL enzymes has limited the repertoire that can be rationally engineered. We report here a crystal structure of MmeI in complex with its DNA substrate and an S-adenosylmethionine analog (Sinefungin). The structure uncovers for the first time the interactions that underlie MmeI-DNA recognition and methylation (5’-TCCRAC-3’; R = purine) and provides a molecular basis for changing specificity at four of the six base pairs of the recognition sequence (5’-TCCRAC-3’). Surprisingly, the enzyme is resilient to specificity changes at the first position of the recognition sequence (5’-TCCRAC-3’). Collectively, the structure provides a basis for engineering further derivatives of MmeI and delineates which base pairs of the recognition sequence are more amenable to alterations than others.

Highlights

  • Due to their exquisite selectivity, Type II restriction endonucleases (REases) are paradigms in the study of protein-DNA sequence recognition [1,2]

  • Despite the discovery of more than 4,000 REases, the DNA recognition specificities are limited to only ~365

  • The recently discovered Type IIL MmeI family of restriction-and-modification (RM) enzymes provides a framework for understanding and engineering new specificities

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Due to their exquisite selectivity, Type II restriction endonucleases (REases) are paradigms in the study of protein-DNA sequence recognition [1,2]. 4,000 have been discovered [3], specific for a remarkable 365 different DNA sequences. Impressive as this number is, it represents only a small fraction of the total number of DNA sequences that could in principle be recognized. Unless compensated for by a corresponding change in the partner enzyme, a change in the specificity of either one is liable to be detrimental due to cleavage of the host’s DNA at unprotected sites [10]. Simultaneous, matching changes are exceedingly unlikely among systems in which the REase and MTase(s) are separate proteins that act independently

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.