Abstract
The method dependence of iron silicide grown on Si(111) was studied by scanning tunneling microscopy. The iron silicide films grown by two different methods (solid-phase epitaxy and reactive deposition epitaxy) were compared at a small-film-thickness region below 1 nm. The surface morphology strongly depends on the growth method, which suggests that the strain in the interface region is affected by the growth method.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
