Abstract
The performance of decision tree (DT), learning vector quantization (LVQ), and k-nearest neighbour (kNN) methods classifying active and inactive estrogenic compounds in terms of their structure activity relationship (SAR) was evaluated. A set of 311 compounds was used for construction of the models, the predictive power of which was verified with separate training and test sets. Principal components derived from molecular descriptors calculated with DRAGON software were used as variables representing the structures of the compounds. Broadly, kNN had the best classification ability and DT the weakest, although the performance of each method was dependent on the group of compounds used for modelling. The best performance was obtained with kNN for the calf estrogen receptor data, averaging 98.3% of correctly classified compounds in the external tests. Overall, the results indicate that all the methods tested are suitable for the SAR classification of estrogenic compounds, producing models with a predictive power ranging from adequate to excellent.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.