Abstract
BackgroundAttention deficit hyperactivity disorder is one of the most common childhood neurodevelopmental syndromes. Although clinical evaluation is considered the gold standard in diagnosing psychiatric disorders, in epidemiological studies, this evaluation is rarely used for practical and financial reasons. Instead, psychometric instruments are used to screen for the disorders. In this case, it is essential to investigate whether these instruments are suitable for measuring the proposed problem. This study aims to verify the structural validation of the Attention Problems Scale of the Teacher’s Report Form (TRF).MethodsA random sample of 445 TRF filled out by the teacher of children from São Gonçalo/RJ was selected. The confirmatory factor analysis was applied to validate some factor structures that have been raised in the literature. A second aspect analyzed was the use of structural equation models to verify the validated factorial structure’s relationship with some comorbidities.ResultsThe bifactor model was the most suitable to explain the TRF child’s Attention Problems Scale’s factor structure. It presented the best-fit quality scores for confirmatory factor analysis than other tested structures. Although it presented good indicators for structural validity, some symptoms could be reassessed to have a more consistent instrument. The bifactor model as an explanatory structure in SEM was able to predict important mental health outcomes. These results are an additional validation to the bifactor model.ConclusionsThe results suggest the validity of the TRF’s Attention Problems Scale. The instrument’s factor structure was also appropriate because it corroborated most of the association’s assumptions between subtypes of attention problems and other aspects of mental health. The existence of screening scales adapted to Brazilian Portuguese can substantially impact many children who have difficulty learning. Also, the screening scales can be a useful tool for the health sector to facilitate referral to the professional to make the diagnosis.
Highlights
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder is one of the most common childhood neurodevelopmental syndromes
Clinical evaluation is considered the gold standard for diagnosing psychiatric disorders; in epidemiological studies, this evaluation is rarely used for practical and financial reasons (Buitelaar, 2002)
The comparative fit index (CFI) and TuckerLewis index (TLI) indicate a good fit with values above 0.95
Summary
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder is one of the most common childhood neurodevelopmental syndromes. Clinical evaluation is considered the gold standard in diagnosing psychiatric disorders, in epidemiological studies, this evaluation is rarely used for practical and financial reasons. Psychometric instruments are used to screen for the disorders. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is the most common neurodevelopmental disorder in the early stages of life (Faraone, Sergeant, Gillberg, & Biederman, 2003). Clinical evaluation is considered the gold standard for diagnosing psychiatric disorders; in epidemiological studies, this evaluation is rarely used for practical and financial reasons (Buitelaar, 2002). Using psychometric instruments aims to help screen for large population groups, addressing those who need specialized services (Singh, Yeh, & Blanchard, 2017).
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have