Abstract
We present details of the microstructural properties of Y- (Ba2Mg2Fe12O22, Ba0.5Sr1.5Zn2Fe12O22, Ba0.5Sr1.5Zn2Al0.08Fe11.92O22) and Z-type (Sr3Co2Fe24O41) hexaferrite thick films deposited by screen printing and drop casting on unpolished polycrystalline Al2O3 substrates. The hexaferrites thick films obtained by drop casting exhibited considerable roughness and porousness compared with those obtained by screen printing. We found that the powders’ morphology significantly affects the microstructure of the thick films formed by screen printing. The microstructural analysis of the thick films shows that their microstructure differs from that of the powders. Further, during the annealing process the grains in the thick films grow and form hexagonal particles, the latter having the largest size, best shape and being best observed in the case of the Ba2Mg2Fe12O22 film.
Highlights
The magneto-electric coupling in hexaferrites has provoked strong interest due to the opportunities this effect offers in finding novel functional applications
We present details of the microstructural properties of Y- (Ba2Mg2Fe12O22, Ba0.5Sr1.5Zn2Fe12O22, Ba0.5Sr1.5Zn2Al0.08Fe11.92O22) and Z-type (Sr3Co2Fe24O41) hexaferrite thick films deposited by screen printing and drop casting on unpolished polycrystalline Al2O3 substrates
We describe below our studies on the microstructural properties of Ba2Mg2Fe12O22, Ba0.5Sr1.5Zn2Fe12O22, Ba0.5Sr1.5Zn2Al0.08Fe11.92O22 (Y-type) and Sr3Co2Fe24O41 (Z-type) thick films deposited by two different techniques ‒ drop casting and screen printing
Summary
The magneto-electric coupling in hexaferrites has provoked strong interest due to the opportunities this effect offers in finding novel functional applications. We present details of the microstructural properties of Y- (Ba2Mg2Fe12O22, Ba0.5Sr1.5Zn2Fe12O22, Ba0.5Sr1.5Zn2Al0.08Fe11.92O22) and Z-type (Sr3Co2Fe24O41) hexaferrite thick films deposited by screen printing and drop casting on unpolished polycrystalline Al2O3 substrates. The hexaferrites thick films obtained by drop casting exhibited considerable roughness and porousness compared with those obtained by screen printing.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary 
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call