Abstract
Abstract. The crystal structure of the mineral decrespignyite-(Y) from the Paratoo copper mine (South Australia) has been obtained by applying δ recycling direct methods to 3D electron diffraction (ED) data followed by Rietveld refinements of synchrotron data. The unit cell is a= 8.5462(2), c= 22.731(2) Å and V= 1437.8(2) Å3, and the chemical formula for Z=1 is (Y10.35REE1.43Ca0.52Cu5.31)Σ17.61(CO3)14Cl2.21(OH)16.79⋅18.35H2O (REE: rare earth elements). The ED data are compatible with the trigonal P3‾m1 space group (no. 164) used for the structure solution (due to the disorder affecting part of the structure, the possibility of a monoclinic unit cell cannot completely be ruled out). The structure shows metal layers perpendicular to [001], with six independent positions for Y, REE and Cu (sites M1 to M4 are full, and sites M5 and M6 are partially vacant), and two other sites, Cu1 and Cu2, partially occupied by Cu. One characteristic of decrespignyite is the existence of hexanuclear (octahedral) oxo-hydroxo yttrium clusters [Y6(μ6-O)(μ3-OH)8O24] (site M1) with the 24 bridging O atoms belonging to two sets of symmetry-independent (CO3)2− ions, with the first set (2×) along a ternary axis giving rise to a layer of hexanuclear clusters and the second set (6×) tilted and connecting the hexanuclear clusters with hetero-tetranuclear ones hosting Cu, Y and REE (M2 and M3 sites). The rest of the crystal structure consists of two consecutive M3 + M4 layers containing the partially occupied M5, M6, and Cu2 sites and additional carbonate anions in between. The resulting structure model is compatible with the chemical analysis of the type material which is poorer in Cu and richer in (REE, Y) than the above-described material.
Highlights
In the last years, 3D electron diffraction (ED) has become a routine tool for solving the crystal structure of minerals ordered only in the nanometric range (Kolb et al, 2007, 2008; Gemmi et al, 2019; Mugnaioli and Gemmi, 2018)
Quantitative chemical analyses were obtained using a JEOL 8230-JXA electron microprobe operating in wavelengthdispersive mode (WDS), housed at LAMARX (UNC, Córdoba, Argentina)
The same microprobe was used for energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) to obtain semiquantitative analyses to confirm the identification of other phases
Summary
3D electron diffraction (ED) has become a routine tool for solving the crystal structure of minerals ordered only in the nanometric range (Kolb et al, 2007, 2008; Gemmi et al, 2019; Mugnaioli and Gemmi, 2018). Electron beam damage are those minerals based on selfassembly of metal clusters via H bond networks (León-Reina et al, 2013; Capitani et al, 2014; Ventruti et al, 2015; Majzlan et al, 2016). In such cases application of direct methods like δ recycling (δDM) (Rius, 2012a, 2014) is more complicated since parts of the structure may not show up in the Fourier map. DCP1 contains more Cu and is (Y, REE) poorer In this contribution these differences are rationalized based on the crystal structure of the mineral
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
