Abstract

Structural similarity may be based on the structural characteristics of concrete entities (e.g., the heart relates to blood circulation in the way that a pump to a hydraulic system) or on the structural properties of situations and events (e.g., Your words were a dagger to my heart compares the emotional damage done by the hearer’s words to the physical harm caused by a dagger). In combination with metonymy, structural similarity gives rise to paragon-based antonomasia and allegory-like narratives. An example of paragon-based antonomasia is the Lennon of football, which, said about a great player, is based on structural similarity: the player and the musician are masters, each in his domain of expertise. Allegory-like narratives rely on a form of high-level structural similarity where each entity-denoting target element is elaborated through the member-for-class metonymy. For example, in “The Prodigal Son”, the regretful son’s return to his father asking for forgiveness represents any repentant sinner. In terms of structural similarity, God is to a repentant sinner what the forgiving father is to his returning son. Drawing on a selection of examples, this article reexamines the contribution of different types of structural similarity to figurative reasoning at various degrees of abstractness and complexity.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call