Abstract

ABSTRACTWe estimate a structural electricity (multi-commodity) model based on historical spot and futures data (fuels and power prices, respectively) and quantify the inherent parameter risk using an average value at risk approach (‘expected shortfall’). The mathematical proofs use the theory of asymptotic statistics to derive a parameter risk measure. We use far in-the-money options to derive a confidence level and use it as a prudent present value adjustment when pricing a virtual power plant. Finally, we conduct a present value benchmarking to compare the approach of temperature-driven demand (based on load data) to an ‘implied demand approach’ (demand implied from observable power futures prices). We observe that the implied demand approach can easily capture observed electricity price volatility whereas the estimation against observable load data will lead to a gap, because – amongst others – the interplay of demand and supply is not captured in the data (i.e., unexpected mismatches).

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.