Abstract
ABSTRACT This article surveys how neorepublicanism can address a recent criticism: that it fails to identify and redress structural forms of domination (i.e., not easily traceable to dominating agents). I argue that neorepublican ‘basic liberties’ may outline policy responses to what critics consider structural domination. Then I examine the neorepublican account of social structure as an incidental facilitator of domination, offering two interpretations: as ‘structurally produced agent-level domination,’ and as ‘structural risk of agent-level domination.’ I conclude that, when it comes to dealing with structural domination, neorepublicans fall into the same presumption against state interference they hold against liberals and libertarians.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
