Abstract

This paper describes the X-ray crystal structure analysis of a cholesteryl ester solid solution, cholesteryl decanoate/cholesteryl laurate, grown from a bulk concentration with molar ratio 0.56/0.43. The unit cell is monoclinic with a = 12.969, b = 9.048, c = 31.137 A, and beta = 91.12 degrees and the space group P2(1) with Z = 4 (two molecules per asymmetric unit). The cell constants closely represent an average value of crystal parameters for the two pure components (hence, nearly corresponding to Vegard's law). Although the overall monolayer 1 lamellar packing is superficially similar to the earlier-studied cholesteryl undecanoate/cholesteryl laurate solid solution, a more partitioned distribution of acyl chains, i.e., a microfractionation corresponding to the observed nonideal phase behavior, is suggested. The behavior is similar to that found for n-paraffin binaries cooled below a binodal phase boundary. Although it cannot be detected conclusively in this determination (due to high thermal motion of terminal acyl chain atoms), the non-stoichiometric combination of components also requires some partial occupancy of atomic sites on the chain termini. This structural arrangement is contrasted with the alternative expression found earlier for the more ideal undecanoate/laurate solid solution, i.e., random co-packing leading to fractional atomic occupancy in an average laurate structure. The final weighted R factor for 4578 reflections is 0.138.

Highlights

  • 12.969, b = 9.048, c = 31.137 A, and fi = 91.12' and the space group P2, with Z = 4

  • The experimental phase diagram for binary combinations of cholesteryl caprate with cholesteryl laurate (Fig. 3) resembles one already published for cholesteryl nonanoatehndecanoate binary compositions [8], including the positions of concentration-dependent mesomorphic transitions measured from binary samples cooled from the melt

  • This calculation, using AH values for the pure components, correctly predicts this phase separation behavior in cholesteryl esters when it occurs [8], and we find that these measured isotherms do not represent a solidus line for an eutectic solid, again indicating that the two components are co-soluble over all concentrations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The behavior is similar to that found for n-paraffin binaries cooled below a binodal phase boundary It cannot be detected conclusively in this determination (due to high thermal motion of terminal acyl chain atoms), the non-stoichiometriccombination of components requires some partial occupancy of atomic sites on the chain termini. This structural arrangement is contrasted with the alternative expression found earlier for the more ideal undecanoate/laurate solid solution, Le., random co-packing leading to fractional atomic occupancy in an average laurate structure.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call