Abstract

An analysis is presented of elastic $P$-wave $\pi\pi$ phase shifts and inelasticities up to 2 GeV, aimed at identifying the corresponding $J^{PC}=1^{--}$ excited $\rho$ resonances and focusing on the $\rho(1250)$ vs. $\rho(1450)$ controversy. The approach employs an improved parametrization in terms of a manifestly unitary and analytic three-channel $S$-matrix with its complex-energy pole positions. The included channels are $\pi\pi$, $\rho2\pi$, and $\rho\rho$, the latter two being effective in the sense that they mimic several experimentally observed decay modes with nearby thresholds. In an alternative fit, the $\rho2\pi$ mode is replaced by $\omega\pi$, which is also an experimentally relevant channel. The improvement with respect to prior work amounts to the enforcement of maximum crossing symmetry through once-subtracted dispersion relations called GKPY equations. A separate analysis concerns the pion electromagnetic form factor, which again demonstrates the enormous importance of guaranteeing unitarity and analyticity when dealing with very broad and highly inelastic resonances. In the case of $\rho(1250)$ vs. $\rho(1450)$, the failure to do so is shown to give rise to an error in the predicted mass of about 170 MeV. A clear picture emerges from these analyses, identifying five vector $\rho$ states below 2 GeV, viz. $\rho(770)$, $\rho(1250)$, $\rho(1450)$, $\rho(1600)$, and $\rho(1800)$, with $\rho(1250)$ being indisputably the most important excited $\rho$ resonance. The stability of the fits as well as the imposition of unitarity, analyticity, and approximate crossing symmetry in the analyses lend very strong support to these assignments. The possibly far-reaching consequences for meson spectroscopy are discussed.

Highlights

  • The experimental status of meson resonances with masses ranging from 1 to 2 GeV is very poor

  • Many states expected from the quark model have not been observed so far, whereas several apparently normal resonances listed in the Particle Data Group (PDG) tables [1] do not fit in with mainstream quark models like, for instance, the relativized meson model by Godfrey and Isgur (GI) [2]

  • In Ref. [3], some of the obvious discrepancies were briefly reviewed, e.g., concerning the many observed f2 states to be contrasted with the much fewer ones predicted in the GI model

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The experimental status of meson resonances with masses ranging from 1 to 2 GeV is very poor. [3], some of the obvious discrepancies were briefly reviewed, e.g., concerning the many observed f2 states (with JPC 1⁄4 2þþ) to be contrasted with the much fewer ones predicted in the GI model. Another disagreement is the relatively low mass of the strange vector meson K⋆ð1410Þ, the first radial excitation of K⋆ð892Þ, which is predicted almost 200 MeV higher in the GI and similar quark models. Under the ρð1450Þ entry in the PDG meson listings, one finds a large variety of experimental observations, with a huge mass range of 1208–1624 MeV, depending on the particular strong decay mode. Wigner (BW) parametrizations can be very unreliable, possibly leading to deviations of the order of 10 MeV

Published by the American Physical Society
XN i
The χ
Riemann Sheet
Background
Findings
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call