Stroke Risk After Mitral Valve Interventions: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Abstract

Previous research indicates varying stroke rates after mitral valve (MV) interventions. This study aimed to compare post-procedural stroke risks following transcatheter and surgical MV interventions. Electronic databases were searched from inception to February 2024 for studies comparing stroke rates after mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (mTEER), surgical MV repair/replacement, or guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). Primary endpoints were all-time and early (<30 days) stroke. Secondary outcomes included new-onset atrial fibrillation and 1-year all-cause mortality. A frequentist network meta-analysis was employed to compare outcomes. The network meta-analysis included 18 studies (3 randomized clinical trials and 15 observational), with 51,703 patients. mTEER was associated with a decreased risk of all-time (odds ratio [OR] 0.61, 95% CI 0.41-0.89) and early stroke (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.33-0.51) compared with surgery, and a similar risk of all-time (OR 1.54, 95% CI 0.76-3.12) and early stroke (OR 2.12, 95% CI 0.53-8.47) compared with GDMT. Conversely, surgery was associated with an increased risk of all-time (OR 2.55, 95% CI 1.17-5.57) and early stroke (OR 5.15, 95% CI 1.27-20.84) compared with GDMT. There were no statistically significant differences in the risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.11-1.31) and 1-year all-cause mortality (OR 1.43, 95% CI 0.91-2.24) between mTEER vs. surgery. In conclusion, mTEER was associated with a lower risk of stroke and similar risks of new-onset atrial fibrillation and 1-year mortality compared with surgical MV interventions. Further studies are needed to understand the mechanisms of stroke and to determine strategies to reduce stroke risk following MV interventions.