Transcatheter Versus Surgical Mitral Valve Interventions in Patients With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

Abstract

A significant proportion of patients requiring mitral valve (MV) intervention have undergone prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Reoperative heart surgery is associated with increased risk. To evaluate the utilization and outcomes of transcatheter versus surgical MV interventions in patients with prior CABG. We queried the Nationwide Readmission Database (2016-2021) to identify adults with prior CABG hospitalized for transcatheter or surgical MV intervention. In-hospital outcomes were compared using multivariable regression and propensity-matching analyses. Readmissions were compared using Cox proportional hazards regression model. Of 305,625 weighted hospitalizations for MV intervention, 23,506 (7.7%) occurred in patients with prior CABG. From 2016-2021, the use of transcatheter MV interventions increased among patients with prior CABG (72 to 191 for repair and 6 to 45 for replacement per 100,000 hospitalizations, both ptrend<0.001). Compared with surgical MV repair and replacement, transcatheter MV repair and replacement were associated with similar in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20-1.03 for repair; aOR 0.61, 95% CI 0.38-1.02 for replacement) and 180-day heart failure readmissions (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.56, 95% CI 0.85-2.87 for repair; aHR 1.15, 95% CI 0.63-2.09 for replacement) and lower stroke, acute kidney injury, permanent pacemaker placement, length of stay, and nonhome discharges, respectively. Vascular complications were higher with transcatheter versus surgical MV replacement. Transcatheter MV interventions are increasingly used as the preferred modality of MV intervention in patients with prior CABG and are associated with similar in-hospital mortality and 180-day heart failure readmissions compared with surgical MV interventions.