Abstract

Paradoxical embolism via a patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a common cause of cryptogenic stroke. Because PFO is a common anatomic variant seen in 25% of the general population, clinicians are faced with the dilemma of whether a PFO is an incidental finding or stroke related. Recent clinical trials of PFO closure failed to show a benefit of closure compared with medical therapy in reducing composite primary end points. Yet, these trials may have enrolled individuals with incidental PFO. To derive a prediction instrument to stratify patients by attributable fraction (probability that the index event was related to PFO), Kent et al performed a patient-level meta-analysis of observational cohorts of patients with cryptogenic stroke investigated for PFO by transesophageal echocardiogram or transcranial Doppler (n=3023). The patients with cryptogenic stroke with PFO were younger, less likely to have conventional risk factors or a history of transient ischemic stroke (TIA)/stroke and more likely to have large superficial infarcts than those without PFO. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that the odds of PFO presence was lower …

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.