Stretched sapwood, ultra-widening permeability, and ditching da Vinci: revising models of plant form and function.

Abstract

The mechanisms leading to dieback and death of trees under drought remains unclear. For constructing an understanding of these mechanisms, addressing major empirical gaps regarding tree structure-function relations remains essential. We give reasons to think that a central factor shaping plant form and function is selection favoring both constant leaf specific conductance with height growth and isometric (1:1) scaling between leaf area and the volume of metabolically active sink tissues ("sapwood"). Sapwood volume-leaf area isometry implies that per-leaf area sapwood volumes become transversely narrower with height growth; we call this "stretching." Stretching means that selection must favor increases in permeability above and beyond that afforded by tip-to-base conduit widening (ultra-widening permeability), as via fewer and wider vessels or tracheids with larger pits or larger margo openings. Leaf area-metabolically active sink tissue isometry would mean that it is unlikely that larger trees die during drought because of carbon starvation due to greater sink-source relationships as compared to shorter plants. Instead, increase in permeability is most plausibly associated with greater risk of embolism, and this seems a likelier culprit of the preferential vulnerability of larger trees to climate change-induced drought. Other implications of selection favoring constant per-leaf area sapwood construction and maintenance costs are departure from the da Vinci rule expectation of similar sapwood areas across branching orders, and that extensive conduit furcation in the stem seems unlikely. Because all of these considerations impact the likelihood of vulnerability to hydraulic failure versus carbon starvation, both implicated as key suspects in forest mortality, we suggest that these predictions represent essential priorities for empirical testing.