Abstract

Premised on cultivating present-moment awareness, mindfulness meditation (MM) programs have been shown to significantly reduce state-anxiety and improve cognitive performance in post-secondary students. With increasing popularity, briefer MM formats have been introduced to post-secondary institutions to combat the rising prevalence of student test-anxiety. However, research examining the efficacy of brief MM on a state-level test-anxiety response and its ability to improve cognitive performance in a testing situation is sparse. The present study examined the immediate effects of brief MM on state test-anxiety and cognitive performance. A sample of 50 undergraduate college students (N = 50) were randomly assigned to a brief MM or a control activity. In the current study, it was hypothesized that there would be lower state test-anxiety levels and higher cognitive performance in the brief MM group than the control group. Results revealed that the brief MM group had greater state test-anxiety reduction than the control group at post-treatment. Consistent with previous work, brief MM, however, did not promote any specific short-term benefits for cognitive performance. Our findings, however, converge with past research to suggest that brief MM may produce immediate, short-term state test-anxiety relief. Immediate anxiety relief may be beneficial for students during stressful academic periods.

Highlights

  • Premised on cultivating present-moment awareness, mindfulness meditation (MM) programs have been shown to significantly reduce state-anxiety and improve cognitive performance in post-secondary students

  • It was hypothesized that state test-anxiety levels would be lower in the brief MM group than the control group

  • We examined whether brief MM reduces State-Anxiety Inventory (SAI) scores and promotes higher Cognitive Performance Test (CPT) scores when compared to a control group

Read more

Summary

Participants

A power analysis based on aggregated means and standard deviations for a primary outcome measure (State Anxiety Inventory; Spielberger et al, 1983) at an alpha level of .01, power of .80 and an effect size of .25 indicated that 20 participants per group was needed to detect a significant difference. A convenience sample of 50 undergraduate college students (N= 50) volunteered in exchange for bonus research participation credit (Mage= 23.52 , SDage= 7.56, Range= 18-46). Outlier criteria was set prior to the analysis (±4 SDs from sample means) and two participants (n = 2) were identified and removed from all analyses. Analyses are reported on 48 participants (24 in each group), with 34 females and 14 males. All study procedures were approved by the College Institutional Research Ethics Board

Design
Procedure
Results
Discussion
Limitations and Future
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call