Abstract

There are two different types of cruciform members used in practice. Flanged cruciform sections are typically fabricated from two hot-rolled WT sections welded to the web of a standard hot-rolled I section, whereas plain cruciform sections are typically fabricated from two symmetric rectangular plates welded in the form of a cross. Cruciform members that are subjected to combined compression and bending are typically limited by torsional buckling unlike conventional compression members (such as W-shapes) that are typically limited by flexural (Euler) buckling about their local weak axis of bending. Detailed guidance on the analysis of flanged and plain cruciform members is scarce in literature. Hence, this paper presents numerical studies on the strength capacities of both flanged and plain cruciform members that are subjected to combined compression and bending effects. Analysis results show the ability of flanged and plain cruciform to resist lateral-torsional buckling over longer unbraced lengths, allowing development of efficient plastic resistance.

Highlights

  • Flanged cruciform members are used in high-load applications as compression members

  • Plain cruciform members are used in lower load applications, such as for transmission line tower legs using the built-up construction with steel angles

  • While conventional compression members including W-shapes are typically limited by flexural (Euler) buckling about the local weak axis of bending, cruciform members in combined compression and bending are typically limited by torsional buckling. e American Institute for Steel

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Flanged cruciform members are used in high-load applications as compression members. Plain cruciform sections, as shown, are typically fabricated from two symmetric rectangular plates welded in the form of a cross. Plain cruciform members are used in lower load applications, such as for transmission line tower legs using the built-up construction with steel angles. While conventional compression members including W-shapes are typically limited by flexural (Euler) buckling about the local weak axis of bending, cruciform members in combined compression and bending are typically limited by torsional buckling. Is paper presents numerical studies on the strength capacities of both flanged and plain cruciform members that are subjected to combined compression and bending effects

Literature Review
Guidelines for Strength Design
Numerical Evaluation
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call