Abstract
The austenitic stainless steel undergo warm rolling, followed by cryogenic treatment. The warm‐rolled and cryogenically treated (WR‐CT) sample exhibits superior strength and ductility compared to the warm‐rolled (WR) sample, achieving a yield strength of 949 MPa and an elongation of ≈56.2%. The enhanced strength is attributed to the higher dislocation density, additional grain refinement, and the presence of martensite in the WR‐CT sample. The WR and WR‐CT samples exhibit similar deformation mechanisms. In the initial stage, dislocation slip predominantly governs the deformation. During the intermediate stage, the transformation‐induced plasticity (TRIP) effect dominates the deformation mechanism. In the final stage, nearly all austenite transforms into martensite, and deformation mainly occurs via dislocation slip within the martensite phase. However, in the WR‐CT sample, the TRIP effect is delayed during the stable processing stage (≈8–23%) due to the higher mechanical stability of austenite, resulting from further grain refinement and higher dislocation density. Additionally, the coordinated deformation of strain‐induced martensite with varying orientations contributes to delayed necking, achieving an optimal balance between strength and ductility.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.