Strawson's Way of Naturalizing Responsibility

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessStrawson's Way of Naturalizing ResponsibilityPaul RussellPaul Russell Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Ethics Volume 102, Number 2Jan., 1992 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/293397 Views: 29Total views on this site Citations: 40Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1992 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Nicholas Sars Incapacity, Inconceivability, and Two Types of Objectivity, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 103, no.11 (Jul 2021): 76–94.https://doi.org/10.1111/papq.12376Sybren Heyndels Excuses, Exemptions, and the Challenges to Social Naturalism, International Journal of Philosophical Studies 30, no.11 (Jan 2022): 72–85.https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2021.2022410Sybren Heyndels, Marina Anatolievna Grigorieva Excuses, Exemptions, and the Challenges to Social Naturalism, KANT Social Sciences & Humanities 9, no.11 (Jan 2022): 4–16.https://doi.org/10.24923/2305-8757.2022-9.1Paul Russell Responsibility Skepticism and Strawson’s Naturalism, Ethics 131, no.44 (Jun 2021): 754–776.https://doi.org/10.1086/713954Maria Alvarez P. F. Strawson, Moral Theories and ‘The Problem of Blame’: ‘Freedom and Resentment’ Revisited, Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 95, no.11 (Jul 2021): 183–203.https://doi.org/10.1093/arisup/akab001Jeremy Byrd What Should we Believe About Free Will?, Erkenntnis 86, no.33 (Mar 2019): 505–522.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-019-00116-3Angela M. Smith Responsibility, Reactive Attitudes, and “The Morality System”, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 24, no.11 (Mar 2020): 333–345.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-020-10075-2Keith Allen The Value of Perception, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 100, no.33 (Jan 2019): 633–656.https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12574Vlad Beliavsky On Responsibility, (Mar 2020): 129–146.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41571-6_7Sybren Heyndels Strawson’s Method in ‘Freedom and Resentment’, The Journal of Ethics 23, no.44 (Aug 2019): 407–423.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-019-09302-5Robert H. Wallace Responsibility and the limits of good and evil, Philosophical Studies 176, no.1010 (Jul 2018): 2705–2727.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-018-1147-yAudun Benjamin Bengtson Responsibility, Reactive Attitudes and Very General Facts of Human Nature, Philosophical Investigations 42, no.33 (Mar 2019): 281–304.https://doi.org/10.1111/phin.12233Robert Schroer, Jeanine Weekes Schroer Putting psychology before metaphysics in moral responsibility: Reactive attitudes and a “gut feeling” that can trigger and justify them, Philosophical Psychology 32, no.33 (Dec 2018): 357–387.https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2018.1555800Daphne Brandenburg The Nurturing Stance: Making Sense of Responsibility without Blame, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 99 (Aug 2017): 5–22.https://doi.org/10.1111/papq.12210D. Justin Coates Strawson?s modest transcendental argument, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25, no.44 (Mar 2017): 799–822.https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2017.1284647Joe Campbell P. F. Strawson’s Free Will Naturalism, International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 7, no.11 (Apr 2017): 26–52.https://doi.org/10.1163/22105700-006011220Paul Russell Conversation and Responsibility, The Philosophical Review 126, no.22 (Apr 2017): 285–295.https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-3771958Patrick Todd Strawson, Moral Responsibility, and the “Order of Explanation”: An Intervention, Ethics 127, no.11 (Sep 2016): 208–240.https://doi.org/10.1086/687336Per-Erik Milam Reactive attitudes and personal relationships, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46, no.11 (Jan 2020): 102–122.https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2016.1146032C. D. Meyers Automatic Behavior and Moral Agency: Defending the Concept of Personhood from Empirically Based Skepticism, Acta Analytica 30, no.22 (Sep 2014): 193–209.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-014-0239-3David Botting Resentment and the Impossibility of Universal Abnormality, Acta Analytica 30, no.22 (Oct 2014): 157–169.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-014-0242-8Donald C. Ainslie, Annemarie Butler The Cambridge Companion to Hume's Treatise, 5 (Feb 2015).https://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9781139016100András Szigeti No Need to Get Emotional? Emotions and Heuristics, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16, no.44 (Oct 2012): 845–862.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-012-9386-zEvan Tiffany Choosing freedom: basic desert and the standpoint of blame, Philosophical Explorations 16, no.22 (Jun 2013): 195–211.https://doi.org/10.1080/13869795.2013.787444Elinor Mason Value Pluralism, (Feb 2013).https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee575David Shoemaker QUALITIES OF WILL, Social Philosophy and Policy 30, no.1-21-2 (Feb 2014): 95–120.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052513000058Seth Shabo Where Love and Resentment Meet: Strawson's Intrapersonal Defense of Compatibilism, The Philosophical Review 121, no.11 (Jan 2012): 95–124.https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-1426373Maureen Sie, Arno Wouters The BCN Challenge to Compatibilist Free Will and Personal Responsibility, Neuroethics 3, no.22 (Dec 2009): 121–133.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-009-9054-8Maureen Sie Moral Agency, Conscious Control, and Deliberative Awareness, Inquiry 52, no.55 (Oct 2009): 516–531.https://doi.org/10.1080/00201740903302642Joseph Keim Campbell New Essays on the Metaphysics of Moral Responsibility, The Journal of Ethics 12, no.3-43-4 (Sep 2008): 193–201.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-008-9031-1Troy L. Booher Taking Liberty with Humean Necessity: Compatibilism and Contingency, (Jan 2008): 207–223.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6872-0_12Tamler Sommers THE OBJECTIVE ATTITUDE, The Philosophical Quarterly 57, no.228228 (Jul 2007): 321–341.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9213.2007.487.xTroy L. Booher Taking Liberty with Humean Necessity: Compatibilism and Contingency, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2007).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.998308MICHAEL McKENNA Where Frankfurt and Strawson Meet, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 29, no.11 (Sep 2005): 163–180.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4975.2005.00111.xAndrew Sneddon Moral Responsibility: The Difference of Strawson, and the Difference it Should Make, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8, no.33 (Jun 2005): 239–264.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-005-2484-4Theodore Y. Blumoff Some Thoughts on the Aesthetics of Retribution, Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence 17, no.22 (Jul 2015): 233–254.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0841820900003891Ishtiyaque Haji Deontic Morality and Control, 14 (Jul 2009).https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498794Maureen Sie Mad, bad, or disagreeing? On moral competence and responsibility, Philosophical Explorations 3, no.33 (Jun 2007): 262–281.https://doi.org/10.1080/13869790008523336Kevin Magill Blaming, Understanding and Justification, (Jan 2000): 183–197.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2361-9_14Ishtiyaque Haji Moral Responsibility and the Problem of Induced Pro-Attitudes, Dialogue 35, no.44 (Apr 2010): 703–720.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012217300008581