Abstract

BackgroundThe benefits of trauma registries have been well described. The crucial data they provide may guide injury prevention strategies, inform resource allocation, and support advocacy and policy. This has been shown to reduce trauma-related mortality in various settings. Trauma remains a leading cause of mortality in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, the implementation of trauma registries in LMICs can be challenging due to lack of funding, specialized personnel, and infrastructure. This study explores strategies for successful trauma registry implementation in LMICs.MethodsThe protocol was registered a priori (CRD42017058586). A peer-reviewed search strategy of multiple databases will be developed with a senior librarian. As per PRISMA guidelines, first screen of references based on abstract and title and subsequent full-text review will be conducted by two independent reviewers. Disagreements that cannot be resolved by discussion between reviewers shall be arbitrated by the principal investigator. Data extraction will be performed using a pre-defined data extraction sheet. Finally, bibliographies of included articles will be hand-searched. Studies of any design will be included if they describe or review development and implementation of a trauma registry in LMICs. No language or period restrictions will be applied. Summary statistics and qualitative meta-narrative analyses will be performed.DiscussionThe significant burden of trauma in LMIC environments presents unique challenges and limitations. Adapted strategies for deployment and maintenance of sustainable trauma registries are needed. Our methodology will systematically identify recommendations and strategies for successful trauma registry implementation in LMICs and describe threats and barriers to this endeavor.Systematic review registrationThe protocol was registered on the PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42017058586).

Highlights

  • The benefits of trauma registries have been well described

  • Systematic review registration: The protocol was registered on the PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42017058586)

  • The variables within different trauma registries may differ in various contexts; the majority include data pertaining to pre-hospital care, in-hospital interventions, Paradis et al Systematic Reviews (2018) 7:33 injury classification, physiological response, complications, and patient outcomes [1]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The benefits of trauma registries have been well described The crucial data they provide may guide injury prevention strategies, inform resource allocation, and support advocacy and policy. This has been shown to reduce trauma-related mortality in various settings. Trauma data are instrumental in designing targeted quality improvement initiatives, planning resource allocation, understanding pre-hospital care and transport priorities, and tracking changes in trauma system performance over time They have enabled the reorganization of trauma delivery into more efficient regional systems of trauma care and have played a critical role in the dramatic improvements in trauma mortality observed in many HICs [8]

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call