Trauma registry implementation in low- and middle-income countries: challenges and opportunities

Abstract

BackgroundTrauma registries are an essential part of trauma quality improvement programs aimed at decreasing morbidity and mortality in high-income countries. In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where the burden of injury is disproportionately high, hospitals have faced challenges in adapting trauma registry models implemented in high-income countries. We analyze the barriers to trauma registry implementation in LMICs to inform development of sustainable models in resource-constrained settings. Materials and methodsA structured review of published literature was performed. Relevant abstracts were identified using the PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL databases. The search terms included were: “implement registry,” “trauma registry,” “wounds and injuries,” and “injury registry” combined with “Africa,” “Asia,” “low and middle income countries,” “LMIC,” and “developing countries.” Articles describing challenges of trauma registry implementation were reviewed in full and details were abstracted. ResultsTwenty-eight articles addressed challenges of implementing trauma registries. Data quality (18), lack of resources (6), insufficient prehospital care (3), and difficulty with administrative duties and hospital organization (2) were reported as the most significant barriers to successful implementation. Solutions to the identified barriers were proposed by 15 articles. All 28 studies acknowledged that the presence of at least one local trauma registry improved injury surveillance and promoted better patient outcomes. ConclusionsMany LMICs face unique challenges to implementation that must be overcome to create sustainable trauma databases. Understanding these barriers and taking steps to evaluate the effectiveness of proposed solutions may further improve trauma care to address the high burden in these settings.