Abstract

Strain-dependent differences have been used to highlight unknown genetic contributions to important behavioral and physiological end points. In this regard, the Fischer (F344) and Lewis (LEW) rat strains have often been studied because they exhibit a myriad of behavioral and physiological differences. Recently, schedule-induced polydipsia (SIP), a potential model of stress and drug abuse, has been reported to differ between the two strains (see [Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 67 (2002) 809]) with F344 rats displaying greater levels of consumption than LEW rats. Given the importance of SIP as a behavioral model of stress and of drug abuse, the present study further explored SIP in F344 and LEW strains by assessing the acquisition and steady-state performance of SIP (under a fixed-time 30 schedule of food delivery; FT30), its characteristic postprandial temporal licking pattern and its modulation by variations in the food delivery schedule (FT15, FT30 and FT60). F344 rats acquired SIP at a faster rate and drank at a higher asymptotic level than LEW rats. Both strains displayed the typical inverted U-shaped post-pellet pattern of drinking and changes in levels of consumption (and displacement of the initiation of post-pellet drinking) with changes in the FT value, supporting the position that the increased drinking seen in both groups was schedule induced. These strain differences in SIP are consistent with the fact that the F344 and LEW strains differ on other behavioral and physiological indices of stress and raise the issue of the use of this model in the assessment of differential drug intake between the two strains.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.