Straight/Narrative? Writing Style Changes Readers' Perceptions of Story Quality

Abstract

Few studies have empirically examined whether narratives work or whether the straight-news approach is unappealing to readers as has been suggested.1 This exploratory study examined these issues, and it also investigated whether the subject matter of a story, separate from writing style, had an effect on reader assessment of story traits and whether writing style influenced readers' assessment of the importance of the news subject (also known as salience). Research questions for this study follow:Research QuestionsRQ1:Is writing style related to readers' assessments of a story in terms of its interestingness, informativeness, dullness and other story characteristics?RQ 2:Is story subject matter related to readers' assessments of story characteristics?BackgroundA basic component of any journalism curriculum is instruction in news writing. News-writing textbooks and other aids typically begin by emphasizing a straight-news approach then encourage students to move beyond the inverted toward narrative techniques that help the reader see the story and/or understand complex issues-especially in nondeadline stories.2 However, not everyone agrees that the narrative style is always advantageous. Haas, for example, has written that the narrative could make it difficult for readers to understand the significance of the news.3At the same time, supporters of the narrative approach to news emphasize the basics-who, what, when, where, why and how-and encourage journalists to think of them in terms of story line and character.4Story style is not only the concern of educators and journalists, but also of newspaper managers, who seek to maintain and increase circulation levels. Johnson of the Poynter Institute's leadership and management faculty argued that the inverted pyramid is off-putting to most readers while a 'feature-style' approach to all types of news ... has special appeal to many at-risk readers, particularly younger people and women.5Studies of writing style have produced mixed results. Bostian tested the readability of two science news stories written in three styles on 266 college students.6 The participants in this study read active passages more quickly and judged those passages more interesting than both the passive and nominal passages. Chartprasert found that subjects rated authors who used a bureaucratic writing style as more intelligent, educated and expert than authors who used simple style.7 In a study of the use of imagery in writing, Tankard and Hendrickson found that show sentences were not seen as more credible, contrary to those who argue that a straight-news style of writing is less persuasive.8Studies from a range of perspectives have considered the effect of particular story characteristics on reader estimation of issue salience. Gibson and Zillman found support for their hypothesis that quotes could make an issue seem to be more salient and/or compelling for the consumer of a news report and sway a reader's or listener's perception and judgment of an issue.9OverviewStories about crime and the environment served as the independent variables in the experiment. These two subjects were used to check for the possibility that participants might react to the story's subject matter, rather than to its writing style. The topics were also selected because they focus on societal risks, which made it possible to draw from the literature in creating an instrument that served to explore the impact of story style on salience.MethodStories were drawn from actual news accounts and then treated to create one straight-news and one narrative version of both a crime story and an environmental story. The stories were typeset to appear identical. Neither version of the stories included direct quotations or headlines in order to eliminate possible confounding variables.10Participants were 117undergraduates enrolled in two introductory communication courses at a large midwestern university. …