Abstract

The peak tracking problem can be reduced to a Kalman falter problem [1] with the additional variable of the excursion amplitude <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">c</tex> , which is then obtained by maximizing the expected peak. In the special case where the parameters do not change, the method yields two tracking procedures depending on the criterion used: 1) Tracking for a limited time and then settling for the parameter value so determined. It is shown that the expected error is proportional to t <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">-1</sup> , where <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">t</tex> is the tracking time [2]. 2) A procedure which agrees with the Kiefer-Wolfowitz stochastic approximation method [3]. It is shown further that the expected total reduction in peak value (due to error and hunting loss) is proportional to <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">t^{-1/2}.</tex>

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call