Abstract

Geoneutrino observations, first achieved by KamLAND in 2005 and followed by Borexino in 2010, have accumulated statistics and improved sensitivity for more than ten years. The uncertainty of the geoneutrino flux at the surface is now reduced to a level small enough to set useful constraints on U and Th abundances in the Bulk Silicate Earth (BSE). However, in order to make inferences on earth’s compositional model, the contributions from the local crust need to be understood within a similar uncertainty. Here we develop a new method to construct a stochastic crustal composition model utilizing Bayesian inference. While the methodology has general applicability, it incorporates all the local uniqueness in its probabilistic framework. Unlike common approaches for this type of problem, our method does not depend on crustal segmentation into upper, (middle) and lower, whose classification and boundaries are not always well defined. We also develop a new modeling method to infer rock composition distributions that conserve mass balance and therefore do not bias the results. Combined with a new vast collection of geochemical data for rock samples in the Japan arc, we apply this method to geoneutrino observation at Kamioka, Japan. Currently a difficulty remains in the handling of correlations in the flux integration; we conservatively assume maximum correlation, which leads to large flux estimation errors of 60–70%. Despite the large errors, this is the first local crustal model for geoneutrino flux prediction with probabilistic error estimation in a reproducible way.

Highlights

  • Recent developments on detection of low energy antineutrinos with large scintillation detectors, such as the KamLAND detector (Eguchi et al, 2003) in Kamioka, Japan, and the Borexino detector (Alimonti et al, 2009) in Gran Sasso, Italy, have demonstrated their ability to detect antineutrinos from radioactive decays inside the earth (Araki et al, 2005; Bellini et al, 2010)

  • Compared to the quoted “subjective” uncertainty of the Bulk Silicate Earth (BSE) model composition (McDonough & Sun, 1995), 20% (U) and 15% (Th), the KamLAND measurement demonstrates that geoneutrino observations are able to set useful constraints on earth models

  • In order to use the geoneutrino observation to make inferences on global Earth science, the local crustal contribution needs to be understood with better accuracy than the flux observation errors; or at least, the local contribution must be modeled with a quantitative estimation of its uncertainties

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Recent developments on detection of low energy antineutrinos with large scintillation detectors, such as the KamLAND detector (Eguchi et al, 2003) in Kamioka, Japan, and the Borexino detector (Alimonti et al, 2009) in Gran Sasso, Italy, have demonstrated their ability to detect antineutrinos from radioactive decays inside the earth (geoneutrinos) (Araki et al, 2005; Bellini et al, 2010). Geoneutrinos are expected to bring unique knowledge about energetics and composition of the deep interior of the earth (e.g., Krauss et al, 1984, Kobayashi & Fukao, 1991; Raghavan et al, 1998; Mantovani et al, 2004; Enomoto et al, 2007; Šrámek et al, 2013), extraction of such information from geoneutrino observations at the surface requires detailed understanding of local crustal contributions. Compared to the quoted “subjective” uncertainty of the Bulk Silicate Earth (BSE) model composition (McDonough & Sun, 1995), 20% (U) and 15% (Th), the KamLAND measurement demonstrates that geoneutrino observations are able to set useful constraints on earth models. As shown in Enomoto et al (2007), geoneutrinos from the Japan crust contributes approximately half of the total flux observed at Kamioka. In order to use the geoneutrino observation to make inferences on global Earth science, the local crustal contribution needs to be understood with better accuracy than the flux observation errors; or at least, the local contribution must be modeled with a quantitative estimation of its uncertainties

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.