Abstract

The Stratonovich and Itô interpretations of a stochastic integral are mathematically consistent, distinct representations that yield contrasting response characteristics for stochastic dynamical systems subjected to multiplicative noise, such as parametric random excitation. The contrasting dynamics from the two interpretations currently remain unexplored in vibration energy harvester dynamics. We analytically investigate the dynamics of a generic piezoelectric, nonlinear vibration energy harvester simultaneously subjected to stochastic damping and external random excitation, focusing on the contrasting dynamics engendered by the two interpretations. Numerically solving the Stratonovich and Itô stochastic differential equations in the nonequilibrium regime of harvester dynamics, we find that the Stratonovich version yields significantly higher root mean square values of the harvester voltage output, for lower values of the mechanical damping coefficient. Furthermore, we find positive values for the leading Lyapunov exponent indicating instabilities in the harvester response unique to the Stratonovich interpretation. Additionally, comparing the results for the harvester electrical output between the cases of external excitation represented by the white noise and the Ornstein–Uhlenbeck noise processes, we find lower root mean square values of the voltage output in the latter case. Moreover, the results indicate that the averaged voltage output becomes progressively lower with increasing correlation time of the Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process. Studying the equilibrium dynamics by deriving Fokker–Planck equations for the response amplitude of the harvester using the harmonic balance method and stochastic averaging techniques, we solve for the stationary probability densities to find that the harvester is more likely to attain a well-defined equilibrium state under the Itô interpretation. In summary, the results contribute to the theoretical understanding of the fundamental contrast between the Stratonovich and Itô interpretations in vibration energy harvester dynamics and are expected to motivate advances in harvester design for various applications.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call