Abstract

Authorial views are often subordinated to publishing exigencies when blurbs are written, but these blurbs are significant because of what they say about the apparently desirable features of a work. The first three sentences of the cover copy of Steve Pincus's new book are as follows: “For two hundred years historians have viewed England's Glorious Revolution of 1688–1689 as an unrevolutionary revolution—bloodless, consensual, aristocratic, and above all, sensible. In this brilliant new interpretation Steve Pincus refutes this traditional view. By expanding the interpretive lens to include a broader geographical and chronological frame, Pincus demonstrates that England's revolution was a European event, that it took place over a number of years, not months, and that it had repercussions in India, North America, the West Indies, and throughout continental Europe.” Turning to the back, the encomia begin with Bernard Bailyn: “Pincus challenges Macaulay and the orthodox view that the Glorious Revolution was moderate, peaceful, and conservative and reveals a violent transformational event.” John Brewer discerns “a radical interpretation,” and Nigel Smith claims that “Pincus overturns many received views.”

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.