Abstract

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION: In many countries, endodontic files continue to be sterilised and reused in multiple clinical cases as the alternative of single-use of these instruments is avoided due to financial reasons. METHODS: A survey was performed including South African general dental practitioners and specialist prosthodontists to determine the current endodontic file sterilisation methods in place and the adoption rate of single-use protocols of both hand and engine-driven instruments. RESULTS: The majority of respondents (76.6%, n=141/184) indicated autoclaving endodontic files prior to reuse. Almost a quarter of the respondents (23.4%, (n=43/184) used only cold sterilisation. Some respondents (2,8%, n=5/181) indicated not sterilising their files at all. A low number of respondents had adopted the single-use of endodontic hand files (10.9%, n=20/184). Engine-driven files were used only once and discarded by 18.5% (n=34/184) of respondents. CONCLUSION: It appears that, at times, acceptable infection prevention and control practices regarding the sterilisation these instruments are not necessarily being adhered to. The adoption of single-use protocols of endodontic files in a South African dental setting is higher than previously reported. Keywords: Endodontic files, single-use, sterilisation, survey.

Highlights

  • In many countries, endodontic files continue to be sterilised and reused in multiple clinical cases as the alternative of single-use of these instruments is avoided due to financial reasons.instruments are not necessarily being adhered to

  • A low number of respondents had adopted the single-use of endodontic hand files (10.9%, n=20/184)

  • It appears that, at times, acceptable infection prevention and control practices regarding the sterilisation these. Both hand and engine-driven endodontic files are used for cleaning and shaping procedures of root canal treatment. These instruments become contaminated with microorganisms and appropriate cross-contamination and sterilisation procedures are necessary if endodontic files are to be reused on multiple cases.[1]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Endodontic files continue to be sterilised and reused in multiple clinical cases as the alternative of single-use of these instruments is avoided due to financial reasons.instruments are not necessarily being adhered to. Both hand and engine-driven endodontic files are used for cleaning and shaping procedures of root canal treatment. During this process, these instruments become contaminated with microorganisms and appropriate cross-contamination and sterilisation procedures are necessary if endodontic files are to be reused on multiple cases.[1]. Whilst it is common practice to reprocess many dental instruments, the intricate designs of some make effective cleaning and sterilising a challenge. Previous authors have supported the recommendation for the single-use of both hand and rotary endodontic files due to the inability to adequately reprocess these instruments,[2,3,4] this view has been debated.[5] Despite these findings, dentists in many countries continue to reprocess and reuse rotary and hand files in multiple cases following sterilisation procedures

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.