Abstract

People tend to associate anger with male faces and happiness or surprise with female faces. This angry-men-happy-women bias has been ascribed to either top-down (e.g., well-learned stereotypes) or bottom-up (e.g., shared morphological cues) processes. The dissociation between these two theoretical alternatives has proved challenging. The current effort addresses this challenge by harnessing two complementary metatheoretical approaches to dimensional interaction: Garner's logic of inferring informational structure and General Recognition Theory—a multidimensional extension of signal detection theory. Conjoint application of these two rigorous methodologies afforded us to: (a) uncover the internal representations that generate the angry-men-happy-women phenomenon, (b) disentangle varieties of perceptual (bottom-up) and decisional (top-down) sources of interaction, and (c) relate operational and theoretical meanings of dimensional independence. The results show that the dimensional interaction between emotion and gender is generated by varieties of perceptual and decisional biases. These outcomes document the involvement of both bottom-up (e.g., shared morphological structures) and top-down (stereotypes) factors in social perception.

Highlights

  • Close your eyes and try to imagine an angry face

  • At the dimensional level, facial emotion and gender appeared as separable dimensions

  • Neither of the dimensions produced Garner interference, suggesting that observers could pay perfect selective attention to the criterial dimension, while ignoring irrelevant variation on the unattended dimension. These results provide a conceptual replication of the findings by Le Gal and Bruce (2002)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Close your eyes and try to imagine an angry face. What is the gender of this face? imagine a happy or surprised face. People tend to associate angry expression with masculine faces, and happy or surprised expressions with feminine faces (Le Gal and Bruce, 2002; Atkinson et al, 2005; Becker et al, 2007). This bias has been dubbed: “the confounded nature of angry men and happy women” (Becker et al, 2007, p.179). The bias may emerge at a decisional level, since long-term learned or imagined associations

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call