Abstract
A group of patients with the monofixation syndrome were assessed prospectively to compare performance on Titmus and Randot stereograms under monocular and binocular conditions. These patients achieved monofixation either as a result of surgery for infantile esotropia, or because of a partially accommodative esotropia or significant anisometropia. Their ability to detect elevation of the Titmus circles was not significantly better with two eyes as compared to that level achieved using only their monofixating eye. However, performance on the Titmus animals and on Randot circles or animals showed better discrimination. These data would suggest that the monocular clues available in determining elevation of the Titmus circles would invalidate establishing a diagnosis of monofixation.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
