Stent Graft vs Drug-Coated Balloon in Endovascular Treatment of Complex Femoropopliteal Artery Lesions: A 2-Center Experience.

Abstract

Both stent grafts (SG) and drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have shown to be effective treatments for long and complex femoropopliteal (FP) lesions. However, there has not been a clinical trial comparing the 2 treatments directly. This study aims to compare the primary patency (PP) and clinical outcomes of SG and DCB for endovascular treatment of complex FP Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) C/D lesions in patients. From July 2013 to May 2019, a retrospective study was conducted at 2 medical centers to compare the clinical outcomes of Viabahn SG and DCB angioplasty in patients with TASC C/D FP lesions. The study used overlap weighting to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics and to reduce the impact of confounding factors and selection bias between the 2 groups. The primary endpoint was PP through 24 months, and the secondary endpoints included freedom from clinical-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), all-cause of death rate, and major amputation rate. A total of 161 limbs in 150 patients with TASC C/D FP lesions were treated either with Viabahn SGs (67 limbs, 65 patients) or DCBs (94 limbs, 85 patients). In the DCB group, 22 target vessels (23.4%) underwent directional atherectomy before DCB angioplasty and 37 target vessels (39.4%) underwent bail-out bare-metal stent implantation for early recoil or severe dissection. The SG group had significantly higher PP rates at both the 12 and 24 months than in the DCB group (75.8% vs 39.2%, p=0.02; 64.1% vs 31.9%, p=0.02), respectively. However, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of CD-TLR, death rate, and major amputation rate. According to the results of multivariate analysis, DCB angioplasty was the only independent predictor associated with restenosis (hazard ratio [HR]=0.264, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.100-0.696, p=0.007). This study showed that SG was associated with a significantly higher PP rate in complex long FP lesions compared with DCB angioplasty. However, there was no significant difference in the freedom from CD-TLR and major amputation rate. It is important to follow the criteria for using SG strictly to avoid early restenosis, which can lead to acute thrombosis and severe limb ischemia. Closer monitoring is recommended for patients who undergo SG implantation. There has no head-to-head clinical trial that compares DCB and SG in complex long FP lesions. This study showed that SG following the criteria was associated with a significantly higher PP rate compared with DCB angioplasty. Closer monitoring is recommended for patients with SG to avoid acute thrombosis. Randomized controlled trials comparing SG and DCB are necessary.