Abstract
BackgroundCompared to other countries in the South Asia Nepal has seen a slow progress in the coverage of health insurance. Despite of a long history of the introduction of health insurance (HI) and a high priority of the government of Nepal it has not been able to push rapidly its social health insurance to its majority of the population. There are many challenges while to achieve universal health insurance in Nepal ranging from existing policy paralysis to program operation. This study aims to identify the enrollment and dropout rates of health insurance and its determinants in selected districts of Nepal.MethodsThe study was conducted while using a mixed method including both quantitative and qualitative approaches. Numerical data related to enrollment and dropout rates were taken from Health Insurance Board (HIB) of Nepal. For the qualitative data, three districts, Bardiya, Chitwan, and Gorkha of Nepal were selected purposively. Enrollment assistants (EA) of social health insurance program were taken as the participants of study. Focus group discussions (FGD) were arranged with the selected EAs using specific guidelines along with unstructured questions. The results from numerical data and focus group discussions are synthesized and presented accordingly.ResultsThe findings of the study suggested variation in enrollment and dropout of health insurance in the districts. Enrollment coverage was 13,545 (1%), 249,104 (5%), 1,159,477 (9%) and 1,676,505 (11%) from 2016 to 2019 among total population and dropout rates were 9121(67%), 110,885 (44%) and 444,967 (38%) among total enrollment from 2016 to 2018 respectively. Of total coverage, more than one-third proportion was subsidy enrollment—free enrollment for vulnerable groups. The population characteristics of unwilling and dropout in social health insurance came from relatively well-off families, government employees, businessman, migrants’ people, some local political leaders as well as the poor class families. The major determinants of poor enrollment and dropout were mainly due to unavailability of enough drugs, unfriendly behavior of health workers, and indifferent behavior of the care personnel to the insured patients in health care facilities and prefer to take health service in private clinic for their own benefits. The long maturation time to activate health service, limited health package and lack of copayment in different types of health care were the factors related to inefficient program and policy implementation.ConclusionThere is a high proportion of dropout and subsidy enrollment, the key challenge for sustainability of health insurance program in Nepal. Revisiting of existing HI policy on health care packages, more choices on copayment, capacity building of enrollment assistants and better coordination between health insurance board and health care facilities can increase the enrollment and minimize the dropout.
Highlights
Promoting well-being by ensuring healthy lives remains one of the key agendas in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) adopted by the United Nations (UN) member states in 2015
There was a wide variation in enrollment rates at the districts level with Palpa leading by some margin at an enrollment rate of 17% followed by Kaski (8.02%) and Ilam, (7.26%)
Results from qualitative analysis Focus group discussions (FGD) explored the characteristics of the households that were not willing to enroll in health insurance program and those who opted to drop out
Summary
Promoting well-being by ensuring healthy lives remains one of the key agendas in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) adopted by the UN member states in 2015. Very few countries in the world have fully covered health insurance schemes. This is mainly limited to European countries, Japan, South Korea, Australia and Israel having already achieved universal (cent percent) health insurance. Health insurance systems in some of the developed and developing countries like Nepal vary in a wide array of dimensions, including risk bearing, choices allowed, sources of revenue and its redistribution, cost saving strategies and presence of specialized and secondary insurance [2]. Compared to other countries in the South Asia Nepal has seen a slow progress in the coverage of health insurance.
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have