Abstract

In this paper, we present statistical simulation techniques of interest in substantial interpretation of regression results. Taking stock of recent literature on causality, we argue that such techniques can operate within a counterfactual framework. To illustrate, we report findings using post-electoral data on voter turnout. The analysis of quantitative data, and the estimation of regression models in particular, can now be considered commonplace in the social sciences. There are, of course, notable variations in the ways those analyses are generated (research design, estimation methods, etc.). In the same way, there are discrepancies in terms of standards when it comes to the interpretation of the results and their proper

Highlights

  • As it is the main focus of our demonstration, let us focus mainly on the results for our variable of interest, that is cynicism. It is statistically significant at the 0.001 level, and the negative coefficient suggests that a greater level of cynicism induces a lower propensity to vote, when all things remain constant

  • We have shown in this paper that relatively simple methods can be applied, following statistical regressions, to yield estimates reporting quantities of interest expressible in the language of probabilities

  • We contend that taking greater advantage of such techniques can only be beneficial to flesh out the implications of inferential claims about presumed exogenous variables

Read more

Summary

Introduction

By simulation we mean here two things: 1) the manipulation of the variables to compute quantities of interest and their variations given different values assigned to them, and 2) the generation of these estimates while taking into account the variables’ distributional characteristics. To the extent that we are interested in obtaining a refined analysis of the marginal effect of one (or more) explanatory variable(s) when they take on different values it is possible to apply the counterfactual scheme described above by comparing the predicted probabilities for two given scenarios.

Objectives
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.