Abstract

This paper examines shaft and base grouted concrete piles by conducting vertical static load tests (SLTs) and dynamic load tests. Three concrete piles with shaft and base grouting, with base grouting only, and without grouting techniques were selected, and compressive SLTs were conducted. Two piles with grouting were also assessed with dynamic load tests. Another two uplift SLTs were conducted to one shaft and base grouted pile and one pile without grouting. Traditional presentations were provided to check whether the bored piles reached the design requirement. Interpretations of test results were also provided to determine the ultimate pile capacity. Results from these 5 SLT programs indicated that double-tangent and DeBeer's methods are close to each other, and Chin's method overestimates the pile capacity. Comparison of the results from the SLTs and dynamic load tests shows that the results from Chin's method are close to dynamic results, and Mazurkiewicz's method overestimates for friction resistance. The results also demonstrate that base and shaft grouted pile and base grouted pile increase by 9.82% and 2.89% in compressive capacity, respectively, and compared to the uplift SLTs; there is a 15.7% increment in pile capacity after using base and shaft grouting technology.

Highlights

  • With the soaring requirement of building space in metropolises, high-rise building development is indispensable, and deep piles are imperative

  • Zhou et al [27] has reported the static load test of postgrouted pile, whereas this paper examines both static and dynamic load tests of piles on the same case study

  • It should be noted that this paper investigated the piles’ behavior and shaft mechanisms under di erent grouting techniques, which has not been reported based on results’ comparison between static load tests and dynamic load tests

Read more

Summary

Research Article

Is paper examines shaft and base grouted concrete piles by conducting vertical static load tests (SLTs) and dynamic load tests. ree concrete piles with shaft and base grouting, with base grouting only, and without grouting techniques were selected, and compressive SLTs were conducted. Is paper examines shaft and base grouted concrete piles by conducting vertical static load tests (SLTs) and dynamic load tests. Ree concrete piles with shaft and base grouting, with base grouting only, and without grouting techniques were selected, and compressive SLTs were conducted. Two piles with grouting were assessed with dynamic load tests. Another two uplift SLTs were conducted to one shaft and base grouted pile and one pile without grouting. Interpretations of test results were provided to determine the ultimate pile capacity. Results from these 5 SLT programs indicated that double-tangent and DeBeer’s methods are close to each other, and Chin’s method overestimates the pile capacity. Comparison of the results from the SLTs and dynamic load tests shows that the results from Chin’s method are close to dynamic results, and Mazurkiewicz’s method overestimates for friction resistance. e results demonstrate that base and shaft grouted pile and base grouted pile increase by 9.82% and 2.89% in compressive capacity, respectively, and compared to the uplift SLTs; there is a 15.7% increment in pile capacity after using base and shaft grouting technology

Introduction
New layer created a er grouting
Average N value
Sha grouting pipe
Results and Discussion
Force onsite Matched signal
Shaft resistance
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call