Abstract

This paper uses Aristophanes' Lysistrata to draw out the central violent tension of the weaving paradigm in Plato's Statesman. In the Lysistrata, weaving is offered as a metaphor for a tyrannical refashioning of the polis. In strikingly similar terms, the Eleatic Stranger of the Statesman proposes weaving as a metaphor for the best form of government. What is laughed off in the play, the characters of Plato's dialogue seem to take seriously. Through a comparative reading, I argue that the interpretations of the Statesman that take weaving as a paradigm for the best government of state, not only miss the comedy in the Stranger's discussion of statesmanship, but also the tragic allusions to tyranny. Furthermore, by drawing out the dialogue’s resonance with comedy, I conclude that the weaving paradigm succeeds in giving us a means for identifying tyranny in the Statesman; even when tyranny appears dressed up in a political science ostensibly formulated with the best of intentions.

Highlights

  • Weaving, politics, and violence cross paths already in Homer

  • The connection between the dialogue and the play emerges when we study prescriptions of violence, which weaving as the paradigm for rule issues in the Statesman (293a – e and 300d), in view of the comedic portrayal of weaving, which Aristophanes’ Lysistrata proposes as a political solution to the Peloponnesian War (574 – 86).[2]

  • Laughter avails us of a distance from ourselves and, thereby, allows us to move closer to serious self-understanding without which we cannot give due care to our political life

Read more

Summary

Marina Marren

This paper uses Aristophanes' Lysistrata to draw out the central violent tension of the weaving paradigm in Plato's Statesman. The Eleatic Stranger of the Statesman proposes weaving as a metaphor for the best form of government. I argue that the interpretations of the Statesman that take weaving as a paradigm for the best government of state, miss the comedy in the Stranger's discussion of statesmanship, and the tragic allusions to tyranny. By drawing out the dialogue’s resonance with comedy, I conclude that the weaving paradigm succeeds in giving us a means for identifying tyranny in the Statesman; even when tyranny appears dressed up in a political science ostensibly formulated with the best of intentions

Introduction
Politics in the Lysistrata
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call