State of the art on artificial intelligence in orthodontics. A narrative review

This study is designed to actively consider how the use of artificial general intelligence, sparked by the rise of generative artificial intelligence (AI), can help organizations decide who to hire. For a long time, cognitive abilities have been used by organizations as an important selection factor and an important tool for predicting performance. However, ChatGPT, AutoGPT, BabyAGI, and others are heralding the rise of artificial general intelligence, which means that the cognitive skills required of employees will become less and less important. Therefore, through a literature review and expert discussions, this study proposes augmented intelligence as a new intelligence to consider when hiring. To do so, we first examine how organizations are applying cognitive abilities to hiring and outline the history of AI in three milestones. Then, we summarized experiments on the impact of the recently studied GPT-4 algorithm on work to show its impact on organizations, and summarized previous research to present the concept and possibilities of general AI and explain its limitations. Based on this, we conceptualized augmented intelligence as an intelligence that can understand, utilize, and make decisions about artificial general intelligence, and presented sub-factors and behavioral indicators to measure it. We also provided detailed skills, cognitive abilities, and knowledge that can be matched based on the U.S. occupational classification to measure and utilize augmented intelligence so that it can be quickly applied in academia and practice.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is the simulation of human intelligence in machines that are programmed to think and learn like humans. AI has the potential to revolutionise the way that healthcare professionals diagnose, treat, and manage conditions affecting the female reproductive system. Machine learning (ML) is a subset of AI which deals with the development of algorithms and statistical models that enable computers to learn from and make predictions or decisions without being explicitly programmed to do so. Deep learning (DL) is a subfield of ML that utilises neural networks with multiple layers, known as deep neural networks (DNNs), to learn from data. DNNs are inspired by the structure and function of the human brain and are capable of automatically learning high-level features from raw data, such as images, audio and text. DL has been very successful in various applications such as image and speech recognition, natural language processing and computer vision. ML algorithms can be divided into three categories: supervised learning, unsupervised learning, and reinforcement learning. Supervised learning algorithms are trained on a labelled dataset, where the desired output (label) is already known. Unsupervised learning algorithms are trained on an unlabelled dataset and are used to discover patterns or relationships in the data. Reinforcement learning algorithms are trained using a trial-and-error approach, where the agent receives a reward or penalty for its actions. The goal of reinforcement learning is to learn a policy that maximises the expected reward over time. AI and ML are increasingly being applied in the field of obstetrics and gynaecology, with the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy, patient outcomes, and efficiency of care. AI has been applied to the field of medicine for several decades. One of the earliest examples of AI in medicine was the development of MYCIN in the 1970s, a computer program that could diagnose bacterial infections and recommend appropriate antibiotic treatments. MYCIN was developed by a team at Stanford University led by Edward Shortliffe, and its success demonstrated the potential of AI in medical decision making. In the 1980s, AI-based expert systems such as DXplain, developed at Massachusetts General Hospital, were used to assist in the diagnosis of diseases. These early AI systems were based on rule-based systems and were limited in their capabilities. One of the earliest examples of AI was the development of computer-aided diagnostic systems for ultrasound images in the 1970s and 1980s. These systems were designed to assist radiologists in identifying fetal anomalies and other conditions. In recent years, there has been a renewed interest in the use of AI in obstetrics and gynaecology, driven by advances in ML and the availability of large amounts of data. One of the primary areas in which AI and ML are being used in obstetrics and gynaecology is in the analysis of imaging data, such as ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. AI algorithms can be trained to automatically identify and classify different structures in the images, such as the placenta or fetal organs, with high accuracy. Another area of focus is the use of AI to predict preterm birth. Researchers have used ML algorithms to analyse data from electronic health records and identify patterns that are associated with preterm birth. By analysing large datasets of patient information and outcomes, AI algorithms can identify patterns and risk factors that may not be apparent to human analysts. This can help to improve the prediction of obstetric outcomes and guide clinical decision making. In recent years, AI has also been applied in obstetrics and gynaecology for real-time monitoring of high-risk pregnancies and identifying fetal distress. These systems use ML algorithms to analyse data from fetal heart rate monitors and identify patterns that are associated with fetal distress. AI and ML are also being used to develop new tools for the management of gynaecological conditions, such as endometriosis and fibroids. These tools can be used to predict the progression of the disease and guide treatment decisions. One example of the use of AI in benign gynaecology is the development of computer-aided diagnostic systems for endometriosis. These systems use ML algorithms to analyse images of the pelvic region and identify the presence of endometrial tissue, which can be a sign of endometriosis. Another area where AI and ML are being applied is in the management of fibroids. ML algorithms are being used to analyse imaging data and predict the growth and behaviour of fibroids, which can aid in the development of personalised treatment plans. In the field of oncology, AI is being used to improve the accuracy and speed of cancer diagnosis. AI algorithms can analyse images of tissue samples to identify the presence of cancer cells and predict the likelihood of a positive outcome following treatment. AI algorithms can be trained to analyse images from pelvic scans and identify signs of ovarian cancer with high accuracy. In addition to these specific applications, AI and ML are also being used to improve the efficiency and organisation of care in obstetrics and gynaecology. For example, by analysing large amounts of clinical data, AI algorithms can be used to identify patients at high risk of complications, prioritise them for care and ensure that they receive the appropriate level of care in a timely manner. AI and ML have the potential to revolutionise the field of fertility and in vitro fertilisation (IVF). By using data from large patient populations, AI and ML algorithms can help identify patterns and predict outcomes that would be difficult for human experts to discern. This can lead to improvements in diagnosis, treatment planning, and overall success rates for patients undergoing IVF. One area where AI and ML are being applied is in the selection of embryos for transfer during IVF. By analysing images of embryos, AI and ML algorithms can predict which embryos are most likely to result in a successful pregnancy. Another area where AI and ML have shown potential is in the optimisation of culture conditions for embryos. This has the potential to improve the survival and development of embryos, leading to higher pregnancy rates. AI and ML are also being used to improve the timing of embryo transfer during IVF. By analysing data from patient medical histories, AI and ML algorithms can predict the optimal time for transfer to increase the chances of successful pregnancies. In addition to these applications, AI and ML are being used in other areas of fertility and IVF to improve patient outcomes. For example, AI and ML are being used to predict the likelihood of ovarian reserve, predict ovulation timing, and improve the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of fertility clinics. AI and ML are rapidly evolving fields that have the potential to revolutionise the field of surgery. These technologies can be used to assist surgeons in a variety of ways, from pre-operative planning to real-time guidance during procedures. One of the key areas where AI and ML are being applied in surgery is in image analysis. For example, algorithms can be used to automatically segment and identify structures in medical images, such as tumours or blood vessels. This can help surgeons plan procedures more accurately and reduce the risk of complications. Another area where AI and ML are being used in surgery is in the development of robotic systems. These systems can be programmed to perform specific tasks, such as suturing or cutting tissue, with a high degree of precision and accuracy. In addition, robotic systems can be equipped with sensors that provide real-time feedback to the surgeon, which can help to improve the outcome of the procedure. These systems can be programmed with advanced algorithms that allow them to make precise incisions, control bleeding, and minimise tissue damage. AI and ML can also be used to improve the efficiency and safety of surgical procedures. For example, algorithms can be trained to analyse data from vital signs monitors, such as heart rate and blood pressure, and alert surgeons to potential complications in real-time. AI and ML are also being used to assist with post-operative care. For example, algorithms can be used to analyse patient data and predict which patients are at risk of complications, such as infection or bleeding, allowing surgeons to take preventative measures. Overall, AI and ML have the potential to significantly improve the field of surgery by increasing accuracy and precision, reducing the risk of complications, and improving patient outcomes. As the technology continues to advance, it is likely that we will see an increasing number of AI-assisted surgical systems and applications in clinical practice. In gynaecology specifically, there is a scarcity of data and diversity in the data. This can lead to AI models that are not generalisable to certain populations or that make incorrect predictions for certain groups of patients. Overall, AI has the potential to improve the diagnosis and management of obstetrics and gynaecology conditions, and many studies have shown that AI systems can perform at least as well as human experts in several areas. However, it is important to note that AI and ML are still in the early stages of development in obstetrics and gynaecology and more research is needed to fully understand their potential benefits and limitations. Some of the key challenges facing the field include developing AI systems that can explain their decisions, improving the robustness of AI systems to adversarial attacks, and developing AI systems that can operate in a wide range of environments. However, it is important to note that AI is a complementary tool to the obstetrics and gynaecology specialist and it is not meant to replace human expertise. The preceding text is entirely a product of an AI system. The preceding review, Artificial Intelligence in Gynaecology: An Overview was composed and written by an evolutionary AI system, ChatGPT (Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer). ChatGPT is an AI chatbot underpinned by the GPT architecture, an autoregressive language model that uses DL to produce human-like text. The system was trained on a dataset of over 500 GB of text data derived from books, articles, and websites prior to 2021. The system can engage in responsive dialogue, generate computer code, and produce coherent and fluent text.1 ChatGPT was conceived by OpenAI, an AI laboratory based in San Francisco, California, founded by Elon Musk and Sam Altman in 2015. Since its public release on November 30, 2022, the potential for use and misuse has exponentially grown,2 ultimately leading to the prohibition of the utilisation of AI systems by multiple organisations, including schools and universities. Prompted by this interest in AI, the aim of this study was to assess the capacity of ChatGPT to generate a scientific review. In January 2023, a multidisciplinary study group was assembled to develop the study protocol, confirm the methodology and approve the topic. This research was exempt from ethics review under National Health and Medical Research Council guidelines.3 ChatGPT was instructed to generate an narrative review based on dialogue with the lead author, AY. The input was informed by collaborative meetings of the study group over the study period. The study group nominated the topic, 'Artificial Intelligence in Gynaecology', but ChatGPT generated the title, structure and content for this paper. The study group defined the input parameters for ChatGPT and each AI output was reviewed by the authors for consistency and context, informing the next input. The dialogue thus became increasingly specific and refined in each iteration, as the initial general outline was expanded to include specific subheadings, academic language and academic references. The review was finalised from the ChatGPT output through an explicit composition protocol, limiting assembly to cut and paste, deletion to whole sentences (but not words) and conversion to Australian English. No grammatical or syntax correction was performed. The AI output was cross-referenced and verified by the study group. In this study, ChatGPT generated 7112 words in over 15 iterations, including 32 references. The output was restricted to the final review of 1809 words and nine unique references after removing duplicates4 and incorrect references (19). The final paper was submitted for blinded peer review. Thus, this study has demonstrated the capacity of an AI system, such as ChatGPT, to generate a scientific review through human academic instruction. AI is anticipated to expand the boundaries of evidence-based medicine through the potential of comprehensive analysis and summation of scientific publications. However, unlike systematic reviews or meta-analyses governed by explicit methodology, AI systems such as ChatGPT are the product of DL algorithms that are dependent upon the quality of the input to train the AI. Consequently, unlike systematic reviews, AI systems are bound by the bias, breadth, depth and quality of the training material. A dedicated medical AI would therefore be trained on an appropriate data set, such as the National Library of Medicine Medline/PubMed database. However, the volume of data is challenging: in 2022 alone, there were over 33 million citations equating to a dataset of almost 200 Gb for the minimum dataset. In contrast, ChatGPT has no external reference capabilities, such as access to the internet, search engines or any other sources of information outside of its own model. If forced outside of this framework, ChatGPT may generate plausible-sounding but incorrect or nonsensical responses.4 Most notably, pushing the AI to include references leads the system to generate bizarre fabrications.5 Our paper demonstrated that only 28% (9/32) of the references were authentic, although better than the 11% reported in a recent paper.6 In contrast to human writing, AI-generated content is more likely to be of limited depth, contain factual errors, fabricated references and repeat the instructions used to seed the output.7 The latter results in a formulaic language redundancy that all but identifies AI content. The human authors thus echo the conclusion of ChatGPT that AI is a complementary tool to the specialist and not meant to replace human expertise. For the moment. The authors report no conflicts of interest.

I n 2008, the Research and Publications Committee of the Information Systems Section of the American Accounting Association decided to sponsor a special issue of the Journal of Information Systems (JIS) entitled ‘‘Reviews of Information Systems Research.’’ The objective of the special issue is to ‘‘publish papers that review a stream of research in information systems (IS) broadly defined.’’ The Committee intended that submissions would review and integrate the IS (information systems) and AIS (accounting information systems) literatures and suggest future research directions in both disciplines. The special issue followed a previous valiant and groundbreaking effort in IS/AIS research integration for the IS section by Professors Vicky Arnold and Steve Sutton (Arnold and Sutton 2002). As editor of this special issue, I took a somewhat different approach to the task than is normal. First, rather than a regular call for papers, I requested researchers to submit extended abstracts. The objectives of this approach were to ensure that the scope of the proposed article was concomitant with the objective of the special issue and to identify any potential overlaps in subject matter. In this process, I was able to negotiate the amalgamation of several writing teams. I also ensured that where there was commonality in subject matter, the writing teams were introduced to each other and worked to manage the writing process. Second, I had clear views on how the papers should be structured. As an author of one of the chapters in the earlier monograph for the IS section, I was impressed with the systematic approach Dr. Arnold took to ensuring a common approach in the structure of the contributions and the discipline exercised in ensuring that the goals of the monograph were achieved. It is simpler to achieve a common approach in a monograph than it is in separate papers in JIS. My ambition was, then, to strongly suggest directions to authors but not to mandate a single approach. As a consumer of many literature reviews, I realize how easy it is to maroon readers in a Sargasso Sea, not knowing how to navigate their way. Readers need clear navigational markers and a sense of direction. Third, I saw the review process as a mutual exercise among writing teams, reviewers, and myself as editor. Given the scope of this exercise, I deliberately took a more active editorial role than is normal. These objectives probably added somewhat to the time taken for publication but did, I believe, improve the quality of the papers.

Large volumes of data increasing over time lead to a shortage of radiologists' time. The use of systems based on artificial intelligence (AI) offers opportunities to relieve the burden on radiologists. The AI systems are usually optimized for a radiological area. Radiologists must understand the basic features of its technical function in order to be able to assess the weaknesses and possible errors of the system and use the strengths of the system. This "explainability" creates trust in an AI system and shows its limits. Based on an expanded Medline search for the key words "radiology, artificial intelligence, referring physician interaction, patient interaction, job satisfaction, communication of findings, expectations", subjective additional relevant articles were considered for this narrative review. The use of AI is well advanced, especially in radiology. The programmer should provide the radiologist with clear explanations as to how the system works. All systems on the market have strengths and weaknesses. Some of the optimizations are unintentionally specific, as they are often adapted too precisely to a certain environment that often does not exist in practice - this is known as "overfitting". It should also be noted that there are specific weak points in the systems, so-called "adversarial examples", which lead to fatal misdiagnoses by the AI even though these cannot be visually distinguished from an unremarkable finding by the radiologist. The user must know which diseases the system is trained for, which organ systems are recognized and taken into account by the AI, and, accordingly, which are not properly assessed. This means that the user can and must critically review the results and adjust the findings if necessary. Correctly applied AI can result in a time savings for the radiologist. If he knows how the system works, he only has to spend a short amount of time checking the results. The time saved can be used for communication with patients and referring physicians and thus contribute to higher job satisfaction. Radiology is a constantly evolving specialty with enormous responsibility, as radiologists often make the diagnosis to be treated. AI-supported systems should be used consistently to provide relief and support. Radiologists need to know the strengths, weaknesses, and areas of application of these AI systems in order to save time. The time gained can be used for communication with patients and referring physicians. · Explainable AI systems help to improve workflow and to save time.. · The physician must critically review AI results, under consideration of the limitations of the AI.. · The AI system will only provide useful results if it has been adapted to the data type and data origin.. · The communicating radiologist interested in the patient is important for the visibility of the discipline.. · Stueckle CA, Haage P. The radiologist as a physician - artificial intelligence as a way to overcome tension between the patient, technology, and referring physicians - a narrative review. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2024; 196: 1115 - 1123.

Taming the Complexity: Using Artificial Intelligence in a Cross-Disciplinary Innovative Platform to Redefine Molecular Imaging and Radiopharmaceutical Therapy

This narrative review focuses on clinical applications of artificial intelligence (AI) in musculoskeletal imaging. A range of musculoskeletal disorders are discussed using a clinical-based approach, including trauma, bone age estimation, osteoarthritis, bone and soft-tissue tumors, and orthopedic implant-related pathology. Several AI algorithms have been applied to fracture detection and classification, which are potentially helpful tools for radiologists and clinicians. In bone age assessment, AI methods have been applied to assist radiologists by automatizing workflow, thus reducing workload and inter-observer variability. AI may potentially aid radiologists in identifying and grading abnormal findings of osteoarthritis as well as predicting the onset or progression of this disease. Either alone or combined with radiomics, AI algorithms may potentially improve diagnosis and outcome prediction of bone and soft-tissue tumors. Finally, information regarding appropriate positioning of orthopedic implants and related complications may be obtained using AI algorithms. In conclusion, rather than replacing radiologists, the use of AI should instead help them to optimize workflow, augment diagnostic performance, and keep up with ever-increasing workload.Relevance statement This narrative review provides an overview of AI applications in musculoskeletal imaging. As the number of AI technologies continues to increase, it will be crucial for radiologists to play a role in their selection and application as well as to fully understand their potential value in clinical practice.Key points• AI may potentially assist musculoskeletal radiologists in several interpretative tasks.• AI applications to trauma, age estimation, osteoarthritis, tumors, and orthopedic implants are discussed.• AI should help radiologists to optimize workflow and augment diagnostic performance.Graphical

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is playing an increasing role in several fields of medicine. AI is also used during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) surgeries. In the literature, there is no review that groups together the various fields of application of AI applied to LC. The aim of this review is to describe the use of AI in these contexts. We performed a narrative literature review by searching PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and Embase for all studies on AI applied to LC, published from January 01, 2010, to December 30, 2023. Our focus was on randomized controlled trials (RCTs), meta-analysis, systematic reviews, and observational studies, dealing with large cohorts of patients. We then gathered further relevant studies from the reference list of the selected publications. Based on the studies reviewed, it emerges that AI could strongly improve surgical efficiency and accuracy during LC. Future prospects include speeding up, implementing, and improving the automaticity with which AI recognizes, differentiates and classifies the phases of the surgical intervention and the anatomic structures that are safe and those at risk.

The rapid advancement in artificial intelligence (AI) has fundamentally reshaped gut microbiome research by enabling high-resolution analysis of complex, high-dimensional microbial communities and their functional interactions with the human host. This narrative review aims to synthesize recent methodological advances in AI-driven gut microbiome research and to evaluate their translational relevance for therapeutic optimization, personalized nutrition, and precision medicine. A narrative literature review was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore, focusing on peer-reviewed studies published between approximately 2015 and early 2025. Representative articles were selected based on relevance to AI methodologies applied to gut microbiome analysis, including machine learning, deep learning, transformer-based models, graph neural networks, generative AI, and multi-omics integration frameworks. Additional seminal studies were identified through manual screening of reference lists. The reviewed literature demonstrates that AI enables robust identification of diagnostic microbial signatures, prediction of individual responses to microbiome-targeted therapies, and design of personalized nutritional and pharmacological interventions using in silico simulations and digital twin models. AI-driven multi-omics integration-encompassing metagenomics, metatranscriptomics, metabolomics, proteomics, and clinical data-has improved functional interpretation of host-microbiome interactions and enhanced predictive performance across diverse disease contexts. For example, AI-guided personalized nutrition models have achieved AUC exceeding 0.8 for predicting postprandial glycemic responses, while community-scale metabolic modeling frameworks have accurately forecast individualized short-chain fatty acid production. Despite substantial progress, key challenges remain, including data heterogeneity, limited model interpretability, population bias, and barriers to clinical deployment. Future research should prioritize standardized data pipelines, explainable and privacy-preserving AI frameworks, and broader population representation. Collectively, these advances position AI as a cornerstone technology for translating gut microbiome data into actionable insights for diagnostics, therapeutics, and precision nutrition.

What Are Patients' Perceptions and Attitudes Regarding the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Skin Cancer Screening and Diagnosis? Narrative Review.

How to realize the full potentials of artificial intelligence (AI) in digital economy? A literature review

Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to impact clinical practice and healthcare delivery. AI is of particular significance in radiology due to its use in automatic analysis of image characteristics. This scoping review examines stakeholder perspectives on AI use in radiology, the benefits, risks, and challenges to its integration. A search was conducted from 1960 to November 2019 in EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and grey literature. Publications reflecting stakeholder attitudes toward AI were included with no restrictions. Commentaries (n = 32), surveys (n = 13), presentation abstracts (n = 8), narrative reviews (n = 8), and a social media study (n = 1) were included from 62 eligible publications. These represent the views of radiologists, surgeons, medical students, patients, computer scientists, and the general public. Seven themes were identified (predicted impact, potential replacement, trust in AI, knowledge of AI, education, economic considerations, and medicolegal implications). Stakeholders anticipate a significant impact on radiology, though replacement of radiologists is unlikely in the near future. Knowledge of AI is limited for non-computer scientists and further education is desired. Many expressed the need for collaboration between radiologists and AI specialists to successfully improve patient care. Stakeholder views generally suggest that AI can improve the practice of radiology and consider the replacement of radiologists unlikely. Most stakeholders identified the need for education and training on AI, as well as collaborative efforts to improve AI implementation. Further research is needed to gain perspectives from non-Western countries, non-radiologist stakeholders, on economic considerations, and medicolegal implications. Stakeholders generally expressed that AI alone cannot be used to replace radiologists. The scope of practice is expected to shift with AI use affecting areas from image interpretation to patient care. Patients and the general public do not know how to address potential errors made by AI systems while radiologists believe that they should be "in-the-loop" in terms of responsibility. Ethical accountability strategies must be developed across governance levels. Students, residents, and radiologists believe that there is a lack in AI education during medical school and residency. The radiology community should work with IT specialists to ensure that AI technology benefits their work and centres patients.

Artificial intelligence is transforming healthcare. Artificial intelligence can improve patient care by analyzing large amounts of data to help make more informed decisions regarding treatments and enhance medical research through analyzing and interpreting data from clinical trials and research projects to identify subtle but meaningful trends beyond ordinary perception. Artificial intelligence refers to the simulation of human intelligence in computers, where systems of artificial intelligence can perform tasks that require human-like intelligence like speech recognition, visual perception, pattern-recognition, decision-making, and language processing. Artificial intelligence has several subdivisions, including machine learning, natural language processing, computer vision, and robotics. By automating specific routine tasks, artificial intelligence can improve healthcare efficiency. By leveraging machine learning algorithms, the systems of artificial intelligence can offer new opportunities for enhancing both the efficiency and effectiveness of surgical procedures, particularly regarding training of minimally invasive surgery. As artificial intelligence continues to advance, it is likely to play an increasingly significant role in the field of surgical learning. Physicians have assisted to a spreading role of artificial intelligence in the last decade. This involved different medical specialties such as ophthalmology, cardiology, urology, but also abdominal surgery. In addition to improvements in diagnosis, ascertainment of efficacy of treatment and autonomous actions, artificial intelligence has the potential to improve surgeons’ ability to better decide if acute surgery is indicated or not. The role of artificial intelligence in the emergency departments has also been investigated. We considered one of the most common condition the emergency surgeons have to face, acute appendicitis, to assess the state of the art of artificial intelligence in this frequent acute disease. The role of artificial intelligence in diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis will be discussed in this narrative review.

PurposeThe current evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) practices and applications is creating a disconnection between modern-day information system (IS) research and practices. The purpose of this study is to propose a classification framework that connects the IS discipline to contemporary AI practices.Design/methodology/approachWe conducted a review of practitioner literature to derive our framework's key dimensions. We reviewed 103 documents on AI published by 25 leading technology companies ranked in the 2019 list of Fortune 500 companies. After that, we reviewed and classified 110 information system (IS) publications on AI using our proposed framework to demonstrate its ability to classify IS research on AI and reveal relevant research gaps.FindingsPractitioners have adopted different definitional perspectives of AI (field of study, concept, ability, system), explaining the differences in the development, implementation and expectations from AI experienced today. All these perspectives suggest that perception, comprehension, action and learning are the four capabilities AI artifacts must possess. However, leading IS journals have mostly published research adopting the “AI as an ability” perspective of AI with limited theoretical and empirical studies on AI adoption, use and impact.Research limitations/implicationsFirst, the framework is based on the perceptions of AI by a limited number of companies, although it includes all the companies leading current AI practices. Secondly, the IS literature reviewed is limited to a handful of journals. Thus, the conclusions may not be generalizable. However, they remain true for the articles reviewed, and they all come from well-respected IS journals.Originality/valueThis is the first study to consider the practitioner's AI perspective in designing a conceptual framework for AI research classification. The proposed framework and research agenda are used to show how IS could become a reference discipline in contemporary AI research.

Artificial intelligence (AI), a field within computer science, uses algorithms to replicate human intelligence tasks such as pattern recognition, decision-making and problem-solving through complex datasets. In endodontics, AI is transforming diagnosis and treatment by applying deep learning algorithms, notably convolutional neural networks, which mimic human brain function to analyse two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) data. This article provides an overview of AI applications in endodontics, evaluating its use in 2D and 3D imaging and examining its role as a beneficial tool or potential challenge. Through a narrative review, the article explores AI's use in 2D and 3D imaging modalities, discusses their limitations and examines future directions in the field. AI significantly enhances endodontic practice by improving diagnostic accuracy, workflow efficiency, and treatment planning. In 2D imaging, AI excels at detecting periapical lesions on both periapical and panoramic radiographs, surpassing expert radiologists in accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. AI also accurately detects and classifies radiolucent lesions, such as radicular cysts and periapical granulomas, matching the precision of histopathology analysis. In 3D imaging, AI automates the segmentation of fine structures such as pulp chambers and root canals on cone-beam computed tomography scans, thereby supporting personalized treatment planning. However, a significant limitation highlighted in some studies is the reliance on in vitro or ex vivo datasets for training AI models. These datasets do not replicate the complexities of clinical environments, potentially compromising the reliability of AI applications in endodontics. Despite advancements, challenges remain in dataset variability, algorithm generalization, and ethical considerations such as data security and privacy. Addressing these is essential for integrating AI effectively into clinical practice and unlocking its transformative potential in endodontic care. Integrating radiomics with AI shows promise for enhancing diagnostic accuracy and predictive analytics, potentially enabling automated decision support systems to enhance treatment outcomes and patient care. Although AI enhances endodontic capabilities through advanced imaging analyses, addressing current limitations and fostering collaboration between AI developers and dental professionals are essential. These efforts will unlock AI's potential to achieve more predictable and personalized treatment outcomes in endodontics, ultimately benefiting both clinicians and patients alike.

The idea of integrating ethics into artificial intelligence (AI) increased globally, and it became an important policy objective in many countries. The ethics of AI has seen significant press coverage in recent years, which supports related research, but also may end up undermining it. The issues under discussion were just predictions of what future technology will bring, and we already know what would be most ethical and how to achieve that. This paper is a literature review in nature; it analyzes previous studies related to implementation of ethics in AI. The literature results indicate that between 2010 and 2021, there were 150 AI ethical incidents; including data privacy and security risks, safety concerns, bias diagnosis, the possibility of hostile entities taking control of AI, a lack of interpersonal communication or a humanistic perspective, wealth concentration around an AI business and job losses. The findings obtained from this literature review can help to propose method for AI; it's, indeed, an avenue for researchers to understand ethics needed in AI. Thus, this is crucial to provide suitable suggestions on planning the next course of action on how to integrate ethics in AI in the future.