Abstract

The theory of state capacity predicts that states with powerful abilities – as long as they are constrained – can promote economic growth. Many scholars argue that post offices historically approximate state capacity and that they can be used to evaluate the state’s ability to promote development. We contest this relationship using Canadian evidence. Using a difference-in-differences method to estimate the effect of gaining a post office on the value of agricultural output per acre between 1831 and 1861, we find no treatment effect. We point out this is likely due to state capacity expansion crowding out efficient private operators.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.