Abstract

Introduction: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common cutaneous malignancy among Caucasians. Most studies compare the efficacy of standard surgical excision versus Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) for the treatment of non-melanoma skin cancers in the high-risk or H area of the face. This case series focuses on the lesser-studied non-H area and suggests the use of standard surgical excision as an alternative to MMS for these regions of the face. Methods: A total of 10 patients with BCCs of the non-H area of the face underwent standard surgical excision with repair at the James A. Lovell Federal Health Center between October 2014 to October 2018. The average age of this group was 77.3 years and all patients were males. Nine of the 10 patients had nodular type BCCs and 1 patient had micronodular type BCC with ulceration. BCCs were located on the forehead in 8 cases and the cheek in 2 cases. Diameters of the lesions ranged from 6mm-8mm. Excision margins were 3- to 5-mm. Defects were repaired using local flaps in 9 cases and linear closure in 1 case. Results: Histopathologic evaluation of the excision specimens revealed clear surgical margins in 9 out of 10 cases. There was one case in which positive deep margins were identified, although the patient had a BCC with a more aggressive histologic pattern. Of the 9 cases with clear surgical margins, none had clinical evidence of local recurrence at follow-up ranging from 2 to 38 months. Discussion: BCCs in the non-H area of the face can be successfully treated using standard surgical excision with a high cure rate and low postoperative complications. MMS should be reserved for BCCs at increased risk for recurrence on the basis of factors such as location in the H area on the face and an aggressive histologic growth pattern (e.g. micronodular, morpheaform, infiltrating, metatypical). Practice points: • Basal cell carcinomas in the non-H area of the face can be successfully treated using standard surgical excision with a high cure rate and low postoperative complications. • Mohs micrographic surgery should be reserved for BCCs at increased risk for recurrence on the basis of factors such as location in the H area on the face and an aggressive histologic growth pattern (e.g. micronodular, morpheaform, infiltrating, metatypical).

Highlights

  • Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common cutaneous malignancy among Caucasians

  • The main goal in the management of non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) is to treat the cancer with adequate surgical margins while preserving maximal function and cosmesis

  • It is generally accepted that standard surgical excision with adequate surgical margins provides up to 95% cure rate with low-risk NMSCs, whereas high-risk BCCs located in the H area of the face as well as BCCs with an aggressive histologic type meet the indication for Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) [7]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common cutaneous malignancy among Caucasians. Most studies compare the efficacy of standard surgical excision versus Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) for the treatment of non-melanoma skin cancers in the high-risk or H area of the face. Standard Surgical Excision of Basal Cell Carcinomas in The Non-H Area of The Face: A Case Series Illustrating an Alternative to Mohs Micrographic Surgery micrographic surgery (MMS) for the treatment of non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) on the face [2,3,4,5]. Most of these studies, focus on NMSCs located in the H area of the face which encompasses the “mask areas”- central face, eyelids including inner/outer canthi, eyebrows, nose, lips, chin, ear and periauricular skin/sulci, temple (Figure 1) [6]. This case series focuses on the lesser-studied non-H area and suggests the use of standard surgical excision as an alternative to MMS for these regions of the face

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call