Abstract

The deployment of mega container ships with a capacity for 18,000 + TEU on major trade lanes is a recent trend within the ocean shipping industry. Larger ships pose multiple challenges to ports and hinterland connections as well as to the beneficial cargo owners. To achieve maximum utilization of their larger vessels, carriers have entered cooperative global alliances on predetermined routes, resulting in new discharge patterns at U.S. ports. These multi-partner networks involve several competing firms which voluntarily and interactively engage in service delivery. Container carriage is increasingly competitive, and requires continuing cost reductions. There is increasing evidence, however, that cargo shippers are less satisfied with the service their supply chains are receiving. Standardizing process performance through supply chain integration and removing inefficiency will be needed to stabilize the international shipping market, but the question remains how ocean carriers will be able differentiate themselves and create improved supply chain performance. This paper suggests an answer through a simple standard performance measurement model. We will suggest that old systems of carrier competition could evolve to greater cooperation and coordination between business competitors, a state sometimes called “coopetition”, by development of standard setting processes for sharing information while retaining specific service delivery structures to provide differentiated value to customers.

Highlights

  • The deployment of mega container ships with a capacity for 18,000 + TEU on major trade lanes is a recent trend within the ocean shipping industry

  • The growth and concentration in maritime transport due to multi-partner carrier alliances has been a mixed blessing for a crucial worldwide industry

  • Carrier alliances have led to greater diversity in the market as a whole with less product differentiation but with fewer carriers offering distinctly different products (Murphy, 2015)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

“The need to confront the oversupply (of ships) has resulted in more frequent and wider cooperation of shipping lines on all routes, providing more and more homogenous services. Coordinated efforts to improve integration downstream toward the destination by ocean shippers, mediated by standardization, will result in better differentiation for individual carriers regarding logistics costs, better performance and service, and more business on specific routes for alliances (Bagby, 2015; Notteboom and Rodrigue, 2005). One component for a manufacturer could be needed on a Kanban or just-in-time basis with little inventory, so that delays are not tolerated well; whereas another component may be and inexpensively stockpiled and may be purchased to obtain quantity discounts, with delivery speed and timing not an issue These service levels must be handled within individual contracts created throughout the supply chain, and there is no mechanism or standard the carriers could use to consolidate and coordinate handling and movement procedures to obtain the specific desired performance. Service adds less than 1% Performance time of of quoted delivery time to service on the cargo. the actual delivery time

C Customer service
18.24 Delivery
Findings
Discussion and conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call