Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes of staged sinus floor elevation (SFE) using novel low-crystalline carbonate apatite (CO3Ap) granules. Patients who needed SFE for implant placement were recruited into this clinical trial. A staged procedure (lateral window technique using CO3Ap granules, followed by implant placement after 7 ± 2 months) was employed in 13 patients. Bone-height increase and insertion torque values (ITVs) were assessed along with histological evaluation. The survival and success rates of 3-year functioning implants were also evaluated. Mean of bone-height increase after SFE using CO3Ap granules was 7.2 ± 2.5 mm and this increase allowed implant placement in all cases (17 implants). Mean of ITV was 25.1 ± 13.2 Ncm and primary stability was achieved successfully in all cases. Histological analyses revealed mature new bone formation (36.8 ± 17.3%) and residual CO3Ap granules (16.2 ± 10.1%) in the compartment after SFE. The survival and success rates after 3-year functional loading were 100% and no complications were found. These results clearly indicate the clinical usefulness of CO3Ap granules for SFE.

Highlights

  • Sinus floor elevation (SFE) has been reported to be a predictable treatment modality for implant placement in atrophic maxilla [1,2]

  • One patient who had staged SFE was excluded from the analysis because the complex of carbonate apatite (CO3 Ap) granules and autogenous bone was used as graft materials for SFE

  • The was recommended the cases residual height lateral window technique using a graft material would be useful to maintain the space the lateral window technique using a graft material would be useful to maintain the between the sinus and floor, a previous reportreport suggested the effecspace between the membrane sinus membrane and floor, a previous suggested the tiveness of without any graft materials in space maintenance

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Sinus floor elevation (SFE) has been reported to be a predictable treatment modality for implant placement in atrophic maxilla [1,2]. The SFE procedure includes two main techniques: the transcrestal (or transalveolar) technique and the lateral window technique [3]. The lateral window technique requires more invasive intervention and more skilled techniques [3,4,5,6]. This technique can be performed under direct vision and can increase more vertical space compared to the transcrestal technique [3,4]. The proper selection of surgical techniques is required depending on the anatomical situation, especially the residual bone height (threshold height: 4–6 mm) [4,5,6], both techniques were clinically reliable and predictable [7,8,9]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call