Abstract

Staff at the Bankstown, Australia, public library were found to hold generally conservative views of public library purpose and to prefer goals which were print-based and directly related to reading. Goals implying response to expressed needs were preferred to active intervention, especially in relation to adults. Nonprofessional staff displayed less awareness of the philosophical basis of public librarianship than did professionals, but they also appeared more willing to adopt innovative new goals. Among recipients of library service, respondents believed that the library placed higher priority on institutions and lower priority on disadvantaged individuals than they themselves would. The most significant influences on perceptions of library goals appeared to be local practice and practical considerations. Enrollment in library education programs, political and managerial expediency, and social needs in the community appeared to be less significant. The implications of the study for the implementation of change in public library goals are discussed.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.