Abstract

Personnel training lasts a lifetime. This is what the existing system of persistent professional education is aimed at. This system implies the possibility of continuing the education at any moment of life from the level at which a person stopped previously. In the article, the concept of continuous professional training in the context of its methodology is considered and the key features of human and education resources are discovered. The particular attention is paid to the issue of obsolescence of the staff education resource and the rationale for its diagnostics conducted through the audit of intellectual capital. The necessity of development of the educational resource for the staff of a modern company and the consequent increase of its competitiveness is presented.

Highlights

  • IntroductionOne of the key competitive advantages of a company is its qualified personnel

  • Under current conditions, one of the key competitive advantages of a company is its qualified personnel

  • The labor market required people to possess a certain set of knowledge and skills, while nowadays, the focus is shifted to the ability to learn, master new fields and types of activities, and possess a certain set of soft-skills, the main value of which is the person's ability to find new solutions of existing production problems

Read more

Summary

Introduction

One of the key competitive advantages of a company is its qualified personnel. In order to attain the objectives stated, the article is focused on the consideration of issues of continuous professional training of adults, since the applied aspect of improving the productivity of work and the company success greatly depends on the performance potential of employees. There are several points of view on the origin of the idea of continuous education among the researchers that study the issues of continuous adult education They are described in the work of E. These scholars believe that "the idea of continuous education has existed for as long as humanity has" The other scientists, such as Kuptsov O.V., Osipov V.G., and others, associate the emergence of this idea with the modern era, which is characterized by the dynamic development of all fields of the national economy and the introduction of new activities. In the monograph of Klyucharev G.A., Didenko D.V. and Latov Yu.V. the approach of American economists is interpreted as follows: "putting these concepts in one row, the economists stressed that the knowledge that a person possesses becomes the main source of the person's well-being in the modern world, and the possession of knowledge is in many aspects more important than the possession of property (real estate, shares, money)" [4]

Analysis
Discussion
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.