Abstract

Since independence Israel’s expansion of its lands on Palestinian lands has been reacted from the Arab community and Palestine. Despite the Palestinian demands for Israel’s withdrawal to the 1967 borders on the road to a two-state solution, Israel did not take any positive steps, and this problem reached a deadlock. Conferences and meetings between the two states to resolve the problem did not yield any positive results. Palestinian independence efforts and the struggle against Israel’s occupying attitude continued for years with the Palestinian revolt. In the study, the historical process of the problem between Palestine and Israel was examined and the thesis of the parties in the solution of important problems such as the status of Jerusalem, refugees, borders, and settlements between the two states. Whether the two-state solution in the problematic region is in line with the perspective of the two states is examined and the obstacles and opportunities in the two-state solution are discussed and current situation in the two-state solution is discussed. Finally, although the two-state solution does not seem possible to be implemented in this process, it has been seen that the one-state solution is not also a reasonable option for both states. It became clear that the state party must compromise with principles for an option that will satisfy both sides in the region.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call