Abstract

Introduction: There is paucity of data on the incidence, risk factors and role of anticoagulation for splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) in acute pancreatitis (AP). Methods: A retrospective review of AP admissions between 2018-2021 across the North East of England was undertaken. Data on demographics, etiology, severity of AP and SVT was collected. In addition, a selective anticoagulation policy for portal vein thrombosis (PVT) and progressive splenic vein thrombosis was explored. Results: 401 patients were included with a mean age of 57.0 and M:F ratio of 1.6:1. 152 patients developed intestinal oedematous pancreatitis and 249 developed necrotising pancreatitis based on Revised Atlanta criteria (RAC). 109 patients (27.2%) developed SVT of which 27 developed a PVT and splenic vein thrombus, 36 PVT only and 46 splenic vein thrombus only. On univariate analysis, alcoholic aetiology, severe pancreatitis, necrotising pancreatitis with >50% necrosis and elevated CRP at 2 weeks were risk factors for developing SVT. On multivariable analysis, alcohol aetiology (OR 2.6, p = 0.002), and >50% pancreatic necrosis (OR 14.6,p = 0.048) increased the risk of developing SVT. 58 patients received anticoagulation for SVT, with a median duration of 90 days of anticoagulation. Recanalization rates were higher for PVT when compared to splenic vein thrombosis. 6 patients developing bleeding complications whilst on anticoagulation therapy. Conclusion: A third of patients with AP develop SVT, particularly those with severe AP secondary to alcohol and with extensive pancreatic necrosis. A selective anticoagulation policy was associated with improved recanalization rates and fewer bleeding complications.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call