Abstract
Background contextSpinal tumors in childhood are rare and heterogeneous, and their treatment is very demanding. It is necessary to both manage the disease and preserve the spinal stability so that the spine can grow normally. As a consequence, results in terms of both mortality and morbidity are often suboptimal. PurposeThe results of a single pediatric neurosurgery institution are reported to highlight the peculiarities and pitfalls of the management of this disease. Tumors are analyzed from the point of view of their localization, histology, and outcome in terms of mortality and morbidity, with a special focus on postoperative spinal deformity. Study designThe study design was retrospective. Patient sampleBetween 1995 and 2011, 134 children (75 males and 59 females) were admitted for spinal tumors, accounting for 7.7% of all the patients admitted for central nervous system malignancies. The mean age was 8.5 years (14 days–26 years), and the mean follow-up was 28 months (3 months–13 years). Outcome measuresClinical and radiological outcomes were evaluated to assess mortality, morbidity, and surgical outcomes. A special interest was directed toward morbidity related to spinal deformity and neurologic deficits. MethodsPatients were divided into four groups: intramedullary (46 patients), intradural extramedullary (25 patients), extradural (53 patients), and paravertebral tumors (10 patients). Data were obtained retrospectively from medical records and radiological archives. ResultsLow-grade glioma was the most common histology (14.1%). One hundred seventeen patients were surgically treated, with a total of 138 surgical procedures. A posterior approach was chosen in 111 cases, with osteoplastic laminotomy in 80. Radiotherapy was administered to 22 patients and chemotherapy to 26. At the last follow-up, 16 patients (11.9%) had died. A good control of the tumor with clinical improvement was reported in 100 patients (74.6%). Five patients developed a spinal instability (3.7%). ConclusionsThe goals of surgery should be histology, spine and nerve root decompression, and preservation of spinal stability. In our experience, osteoplastic laminotomy was a good surgical approach to perform the resection of the tumor with a low risk of secondary spinal instability.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.