Abstract

We have determined the spins $J$ of resonances in the $^{147}\mathrm{Sm}$($n,\ensuremath{\gamma}$) reaction by measuring multiplicities of $\ensuremath{\gamma}$-ray cascades following neutron capture. Using this technique, we were able to determine $J$ values for all but 14 of the 141 known resonances below ${E}_{n}=1$ keV, including 41 firm $J$ assignments for resonances whose spins previously were either unknown or tentative. These new spin assignments, together with previously determined resonance parameters, allowed us to extract level spacings (${D}_{0,3}=11.76\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.93$ and ${D}_{0,4}=11.21\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.85$ eV) and neutron strength functions (${10}^{4}{S}_{0,3}=4.70\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.91$ and ${10}^{4}{S}_{0,4}=4.93\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.92$) for $J=3$ and 4 resonances, respectively. Furthermore, cumulative numbers of resonances and cumulative reduced neutron widths as functions of resonance energy indicate that very few resonances of either spin have been missed below ${E}_{n}=700$ eV. This conclusion is strengthened by the facts that, over this energy range, Wigner distributions calculated using these ${D}_{0}$ values agree with the measured nearest-neighbor level spacings to within the experimental uncertainties, and that the ${\ensuremath{\Delta}}_{3}$ values calculated from the data also agree with the expected values. Because a nonstatistical effect recently was reported near ${E}_{n}=350$ eV from an analysis of $^{147}\mathrm{Sm}$($n,\ensuremath{\alpha}$) data, we divided the data into two regions; $0<{E}_{n}<350$ eV and $350<{E}_{n}<700$ eV. Using neutron widths from a previous measurement (corrected for new unresolved doublets identified in this work) and published techniques for correcting for missed resonances and for testing whether data are consistent with a Porter-Thomas distribution, we found that the ${\ensuremath{\Gamma}}_{n}^{0}$ distribution for resonances below 350 eV is consistent with the expected Porter-Thomas distribution. However, we found that ${\ensuremath{\Gamma}}_{n}^{0}$ data in the $350<{E}_{n}<700$ eV region are inconsistent with a Porter-Thomas distribution, but in good agreement with a ${\ensuremath{\chi}}^{2}$ distribution having $\ensuremath{\nu}\ensuremath{\geqslant}2$ We discuss possible explanations for these observed nonstatistical effects and their possible relation to similar effects previously observed in other nuclides.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call