Abstract

To reduce environmental problems, people need to consistently engage in pro-environmental behaviors. Many environmentally friendly actions not only benefit the environment, but can also save money. Research suggests that emphasizing monetary benefits of pro-environmental behavior may hinder positive spillover to other pro-environmental behaviors. Yet, it is unclear why and under which circumstances this is the case. We propose that spillover effects depend on how emphasizing different types of benefits affects environmental self-identity, as a stronger environmental self-identity is more likely to lead to other pro-environmental actions. We hypothesize that emphasizing monetary benefits of pro-environmental behavior is less likely to strengthen environmental self-identity than emphasizing environmental benefits, and therefore not likely to lead to positive spillover. We tested our hypotheses in four experiments. In Study 1, we found that emphasizing the environmental benefits of pro-environmental behavior strengthened environmental self-identity, and resulted in positive spillover compared to not emphasizing any benefits or emphasizing monetary benefits. However, these results were not replicated in Study 2 that included a larger student sample. Yet, Study 3, including a large sample of the general population, showed that emphasizing monetary benefits weakens environmental self-identity and thereby leads to less spillover than emphasizing environmental benefits or not emphasizing any benefits. Similarly, Study 4 suggests that emphasizing monetary benefits may weaken environmental self-identity and decrease positive spillover compared to emphasizing environmental benefits or no benefits. Our findings suggest that environmental self-identity is not easily influenced by emphasizing different types of benefits of behavior, and consequently, spillover behavior is not easily promoted or inhibited. Yet, emphasizing monetary benefits may be a risk in some cases, as it may inhibit positive spillover.

Highlights

  • IntroductionPeople need to consistently engage in pro-environmental behavior (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC], 2018)

  • To reduce environmental problems, people need to consistently engage in pro-environmental behavior (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC], 2018)

  • We propose that spillover effects depend on the extent to which emphasizing different benefits strengthens the extent to which people realize they engaged in pro-environmental behavior and see themselves as a person who engages in environmentally friendly behavior which in turn influences spillover effects

Read more

Summary

Introduction

People need to consistently engage in pro-environmental behavior (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC], 2018). Spillover Benefits the monetary benefits of environmental behavior may be less effective in promoting the target behavior than emphasizing the environmental benefits (Bolderdijk et al, 2013; Schwartz et al, 2015). Emphasizing monetary benefits of pro-environmental behavior may hinder the adoption of the target behavior, but may reduce the likelihood of spillover to other pro-environmental behaviors (Evans et al, 2013; Steinhorst et al, 2015; Steinhorst and Matthies, 2016). To promote positive spillover from initial pro-environmental behavior to subsequent proenvironmental actions, it is crucial to understand why and under which circumstances an initial behavior may lead to spillover when emphasizing different benefits

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call