Abstract

Technologically-oriented firms must allocate resources between exploration (research) and exploitation (development) activities. While scholars have emphasised the need for a mix between exploration and exploitation, some firms consciously choose to specialise only in either exploration or exploitation. The reasons for such a strategic posture could be many, including rigidities emanating from resources or routines. While previous studies suggest that an exploration/exploitation mix is necessary for success in an innovation strategy, focused strategies have recently come into research focus. We adopt a methodological approach using case studies combined with an agent-based simulation model in order to learn about the effectiveness of specialisation strategies. The results suggest that an exploration-based specialisation strategy can have a relative advantage over an exploitation-based specialisation strategy, and a balanced strategy is not absolutely necessary to ensure innovation success. We find that as competitive intensity increases, the relative advantage of exploration-based specialisation strategy diminishes.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.